These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Secondary Tracheoesophageal Puncture for Voice Prosthesis Insertion Using Flexible Esophagoscopy.
    Author: Ananthapadmanabhan S, Jabbour J, Lai S, Suruliraj A, Smith M, Riffat F, Devadas M, Liem H, Sritharan N.
    Journal: J Voice; 2024 Sep; 38(5):1255.e1-1255.e8. PubMed ID: 35418350.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) with voice prosthesis (VP) insertion is the gold standard of surgical voice restoration in postlaryngectomy patients. The conventional technique involves rigid esophagoscopes and trocar performed by ENT surgeons alone, with technical limitations encountered in patients with cervical abnormalities - in particular those with free or rotational flap reconstructions and postradiotherapy strictures. We report our technique using flexible endoscopy which we show to be feasible and without major safety events, as a possible consideration in the anticipated difficult TEP. METHODS: Our study describes a multidisciplinary approach to secondary TEP involving a combined upper gastrointestinal (UGI) and (Ear, Nose, and Throat) ENT procedure, under the guidance of flexible esophagoscopy, with intraoperative involvement of the speech pathologist to guide VP insertion and placement. The procedure was performed with ease without major complications. RESULTS: We identified nine postlaryngectomy and laryngopharyngectomy patients in our institution who underwent secondary TEP with VP insertion using flexible esophagoscopy and multidisciplinary intra-operative involvement. All patients had pharyngeal reconstruction, including radial forearm free flap (n = 4), pectoralis major rotational flap (n = 3), and anterolateral thigh flap (n = 2). Eight out of nine patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. The technique was successfully performed in all patients. There were three cases of early TEP displacement in two patients, of which one patient had a successful repeat procedure. We found the technique advantageous in terms of feasibility and practicality compared to the conventional approach, and without intraoperative difficulties encountered in achieving the desired field of views or navigating the challenging anatomy in a free flap and post-radiotherapy patients. This includes distorted cervical anatomy, the presence of bulky and hair-bearing flap skin, and stricture formation. Minor complications in our cohort included pharyngo-esophageal spasm, TEP displacement, granulation tissue, and peri-prosthetic leaks. CONCLUSION: Our multidisciplinary approach to secondary TEP was performed with flexible esophagoscopy without major related complications. The technique is advantageous in the surgical approach to VP insertion in postlaryngectomy and laryngopharyngectomy patients who have had radiotherapy or pharyngeal reconstruction. It allows for safe anatomical insertion and thorough evaluation of the upper aerodigestive tract for comorbid benign or malignant esophageal pathology.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]