These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Gelatin-Based Colloidal Versus Monolithic Gels to Regulate Macrophage-Mediated Inflammatory Response.
    Author: Zhuang Z, Sun S, Chen K, Zhang Y, Han X, Zhang Y, Sun K, Cheng F, Zhang L, Wang H.
    Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2022 Jul; 28(7):351-362. PubMed ID: 35469426.
    Abstract:
    Unlike conventional monolithic hydrogels with covalent cross-linkage that are typically elastic, colloidal gels assembled by reversibly assembled particles as building blocks have shown fascinating viscoelastic properties. They follow a gel-sol transition upon yielding and recover to the initial state upon the release of the shear force (so-called shear-thinning and self-healing behavior); this makes them an ideal candidate as injectable and moldable biomaterials for tissue regeneration. The immune response provoked by the implantation of the colloidal gels with special viscoelastic and structural features is critical for the successful integration of the implants with the host tissues, which, however, remains little explored. Since macrophages are known as the primary immune cells in determining the inflammatory response against the implants, we herein investigated in vitro macrophage polarization and in vivo inflammatory response induced by gelatin-based colloidal gels as compared to monolithic gels. Specifically, self-healing colloidal gels composed of pure gelatin nanoparticles, or methacrylate gelatin (GelMA) nanoparticles to allow secondary covalent cross-linkage were compared with GelMA bulk hydrogels. We demonstrated that hydrogel's elasticity plays a more dominant role rather than the structural feature in determining in vitro macrophage polarization evidenced by the stiffer gels inducing pro-inflammation M2 macrophage phenotype as compared to soft gels. However, subcutaneous implantation revealed a significantly alleviated immune response characterized by less fibrous capsule formation for the colloidal gels as compared to bulk gels of similar matrix elasticity. We speculated this can be related to the improved permeability of the colloidal gels for cell penetration, thereby leading to less fibrosis. In general, this study provided in-depth insight into the biophysical regulator of hydrogel materials on macrophage behavior and related inflammatory response, which can further direct future implant design and predict biomaterial-host interactions for immunotherapy and regenerative medicine. Impact statement Macrophages response to implanted biomaterials is a highly regulated process that influences device functionality and clinical outcome. Nowadays, the viscoelastic properties of colloidal versus monolithic hydrogels on macrophage phenotype in vitro and the host inflammatory response are not known. Our study found that colloidal hydrogels composed of nanoparticles of gelatin and methacrylate gelatin (GelMA) led to more anti-inflammatory polarization especially on soft colloidal gel (5.9 KPa) compared to bulk GelMA hydrogels. It suggested that macrophage response can be mechanically regulated by the viscoelastic signals of the hydrogels, which could be a promising strategy for the future design and application of novel biomaterials.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]