These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Cortical potentials evoked by tone frequency changes can predict speech perception in noise.
    Author: Vonck BMD, van Heteren JAA, Lammers MJW, de Jel DVC, Schaake WAA, van Zanten GA, Stokroos RJ, Versnel H.
    Journal: Hear Res; 2022 Jul; 420():108508. PubMed ID: 35477512.
    Abstract:
    Accurate and objective assessment of higher order auditory processing is challenging and mainly relies on evaluations that require a subjects' active participation in tests such as frequency discrimination or speech perception in noise. This study investigates the value of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) evoked in response to auditory change stimuli, known as acoustic change complexes (ACCs), as an objective measurement of auditory performance in hearing impairment. Secondary objectives were to assess the effect of hearing loss and non-professional musical experience on the ACC, and compare the ACC to the 'conventional' CAEP evoked in response to stimulus onset. In 24 normal-hearing subjects, consisting of 12 musicians and 12 non-musicians, and 13 age-matched hearing-impaired subjects ACCs were recorded in response to 12% frequency increases at four base frequencies (0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz). ACC amplitudes and latencies were compared to frequency discrimination thresholds at each base frequency, and to speech perception in noise. Frequency discrimination and speech perception in noise were significantly better for larger ACC N1-P2 amplitudes and shorter N1 latencies, whereas both frequency discrimination and speech perception did not correlate with onset CAEP amplitude or latency. Multiple regression analysis for prediction of speech perception in noise revealed that the strongest model was obtained by averaging over three frequencies (1, 2 and 4 kHz) with two significant predictors: hearing loss (R2 = 0.52) and ACC latency (R2 = 0.35). Thus, explaining 87% of the variance, this model indicates that subjects with longer ACC latencies have worse speech perception in noise than subjects with comparable hearing thresholds and shorter ACC latencies. If hearing loss was removed from this model, the combination of ACC amplitude and latency over those three frequencies explained 74% of the total variance in speech perception in noise. There were no differences in frequency discrimination, speech perception, CAEP, or ACC between recreational musicians and non-musicians. We conclude that the objective ACC N1 latency is a good predictor of speech perception in noise. When confirmed in validation studies with larger numbers of subjects, it can aid clinicians in their evaluation of auditory performance and higher order processing, in particular when behavioral testing is unreliable.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]