These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Donor-specific blood transfusions versus cyclosporine--the DST story.
    Author: Salvatierra O, Melzer J, Vincenti F, Amend WJ, Tomlanovich S, Potter D, Husing R, Garovoy M, Feduska NJ.
    Journal: Transplant Proc; 1987 Feb; 19(1 Pt 1):160-6. PubMed ID: 3547813.
    Abstract:
    DST provides excellent graft survival in one- and zero-haplotype-matched donor-recipient pairs as well as a trend towards improving graft survival in HLA-identical matches; serum creatinine levels are good in functioning grafts; Imuran coverage does appear to decrease DST sensitization to the blood donor in nonsensitized patients undergoing a first transplant, which encourages early DST and transplantation in this group; flow cytometry has been extremely helpful in excluding subliminal anti-class 1 antigen activity in patients with positive B warm crossmatches alone; DST, in itself, does not appear to preclude subsequent cadaveric transplantation in patients sensitized to their blood donor; and the family history of the blood donor is known, with essentially no risk to the recipients of hepatitis, AIDS, etc. In regards to the issue of whether DST or Cs is better, both have merits, and one must be aware of the circumstances that relate to the optimum application of each therapy. Only a prospective study of DST- and Cs-treated patients with a long-term follow-up will probably resolve the issue of the optimum regimen for one-haplotype-matched living related donor-recipient pairs. The ultimate strategy may involve the selective use of each regimen for the most appropriate circumstances.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]