These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Non-invasive angiographic analysis of dural carotid cavernous fistula using time-of-flight MR angiography and silent MR angiography: a comparative study.
    Author: Kandasamy S, Kannath SK, Enakshy Rajana J, Kesavadas C, Thomas B.
    Journal: Acta Radiol; 2023 Mar; 64(3):1290-1297. PubMed ID: 35532027.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: A non-invasive, reliable imaging modality that characterizes cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula (CSDAVF) is beneficial for diagnosis and to assess resolution on follow-up. PURPOSE: To assess the utility of 3D time-of-flight (TOF) and silent magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for evaluation of CSDAVF from an endovascular perspective. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study included 37 patients with CSDAVF, who were subjected to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and 3-T MR imaging with 3D TOF and silent MRA. The main arterial feeders, fistula site, and venous drainage pattern were evaluated, and the results were compared with DSA findings. The diagnostic confidence scores were also recorded using a 4-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Silent MRA correlated better for shunt site localization and angiographic classification (86% vs. 75% and 83% vs. 75%, respectively) compared to TOF MRA. The proportion of arterial feeders detected was marginally significant for silent MRA over TOF MRA sequences (92.8% vs. 89.5%; P=0.048), though for veins both were comparable. Sensitivity of silent MRA was higher for identification of cortical venous reflux (CVR) (90.9% vs. 81.8%) and deep venous drainage (82.4% vs. 64.7%), while specificity was >90% for both modalities. The overall diagnostic confidence score fared better for silent MRA for venous assessment (P < 0.001) as well as fistula point identification (P < 0.001), while no significant difference was evident with TOF MRA for arterial feeders (P=0.06). CONCLUSION: Various angiographic components of CSDAVF could be identified and delineated by 3D TOF and silent MRA, though silent MRA was superior for overall diagnostic assessment.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]