These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Trifecta versus Perimount Magna Ease aortic valves: Failure mechanisms.
    Author: Suzuki R, Ito T, Suzuki M, Ohori S, Takayanagi R, Miura S.
    Journal: Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2022 Sep; 30(7):797-806. PubMed ID: 35603636.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: There are increasing reports of early externally mounted pericardial Trifecta bioprosthesis failure. We compared the hemodynamic performance of Trifecta and Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease valves to determine the failure mechanism. METHODS: We retrospectively included 270 consecutive patients (age: 73.4 ± 8.2 years; 57.5% male; mean follow-up: 48.0 ± 20.3 months) who underwent aortic valve replacement from 2014 to 2021 at a single center and compared the Trifecta (N = 137) and Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease valve (N = 133) patients. RESULTS: The prosthetic valve major aortic regurgitation incidence was higher for the Trifecta than that for the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease valve (6.3% vs. 0%, P < 0.009). Among the Trifecta failures, 33% developed structural valve deterioration, but all requiring redo aortic valve replacement developed major prosthetic valve aortic regurgitation. Freedom at 5 years from redo aortic valve replacement due to structural valve deterioration was significantly lower for Trifecta (89.4% vs. 100%, P = 0.003). The reoperation hazards were determined for Trifecta (vs. Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease): 11.6 (1.47-90.9; P = 0.02), prosthetic valve aortic regurgitation: 2.38 (1.70-3.32; P < 0.01), structural valve deterioration: 20.82 (4.08-106.2; P < 0.01), 5-year mean transprosthetic pressure gradient: 1.14 per 1-point increase (1.03-1.24; P = 0.007), and urgent surgery: 10.1 (2.59-39.0; P = 0.001). The Cox regression analysis identified that prosthetic valve aortic regurgitation solely contributed to redo aortic valve replacement (hazard ratio: 2.38; confidence intervals: 1.70-3.32). CONCLUSIONS: Significantly, more early failures occurred with the Trifecta valve than the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease valve but the Trifecta showed reasonable mean transprosthetic pressure gradient over time. Prosthetic valve aortic regurgitation and calcific structural valve deterioration synergistically contributed to Trifecta valve failure alternatively.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]