These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Inhibitory and stimulatory micropeptides preferentially bind to different conformations of the cardiac calcium pump.
    Author: Cleary SR, Fang X, Cho EE, Pribadi MP, Seflova J, Beach JR, Kekenes-Huskey PM, Robia SL.
    Journal: J Biol Chem; 2022 Jul; 298(7):102060. PubMed ID: 35605666.
    Abstract:
    The ATP-dependent ion pump sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) sequesters Ca2+ in the endoplasmic reticulum to establish a reservoir for cell signaling. Because of its central importance in physiology, the activity of this transporter is tightly controlled via direct interactions with tissue-specific regulatory micropeptides that tune SERCA function to match changing physiological conditions. In the heart, the micropeptide phospholamban (PLB) inhibits SERCA, while dwarf open reading frame (DWORF) stimulates SERCA. These competing interactions determine cardiac performance by modulating the amplitude of Ca2+ signals that drive the contraction/relaxation cycle. We hypothesized that the functions of these peptides may relate to their reciprocal preferences for SERCA binding; SERCA binds PLB more avidly at low cytoplasmic [Ca2+] but binds DWORF better when [Ca2+] is high. In the present study, we demonstrated this opposing Ca2+ sensitivity is due to preferential binding of DWORF and PLB to different intermediate states that SERCA samples during the Ca2+ transport cycle. We show PLB binds best to the SERCA E1-ATP state, which prevails at low [Ca2+]. In contrast, DWORF binds most avidly to E1P and E2P states that are more populated when Ca2+ is elevated. Moreover, FRET microscopy revealed dynamic shifts in SERCA-micropeptide binding equilibria during cellular Ca2+ elevations. A computational model showed that DWORF exaggerates changes in PLB-SERCA binding during the cardiac cycle. These results suggest a mechanistic basis for inhibitory versus stimulatory micropeptide function, as well as a new role for DWORF as a modulator of dynamic oscillations of PLB-SERCA regulatory interactions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]