These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Use of explicit criteria and implicit judgments in a drug-use review program.
    Author: Gregoire JP, Tremblay J.
    Journal: Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Feb; 44(2):332-6. PubMed ID: 3565392.
    Abstract:
    The degree of agreement between implicit and explicit judgments made by a pharmacist in a drug-use review program in an ambulatory-care setting was studied. During a six-month period in 1980, all prescriptions for a group of 19 drugs were reviewed for appropriateness of indication, dosage, and length of therapy by a pharmacist using implicit judgment. The same prescriptions were then reevaluated according to explicit criteria that had been approved by the prescribing physicians. A sample of prescriptions that did not meet either implicit or explicit criteria for use was subjected to review by a committee of four physicians to validate whether these prescriptions were indeed inappropriate. Of the 935 prescriptions evaluated, 36.8% were judged inappropriate by the explicit criteria and 23.5% were judged inappropriate by implicit judgment. The explicit and implicit approaches yielded concordant results for 95.5% of the observations. The proportion of true deviations as validated by the review committee was estimated at 80% for the implicit method and 74.4% for the explicit method. The implicit judgments of a pharmacist appear to be as effective as explicit drug-use criteria for identifying inappropriate prescribing in a drug-use review program. These judgments could be used to increase the efficiency of a drug-use review program when explicit criteria are not available.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]