These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The effect of coupled inhibitory-facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on shaping early reorganization of the motor network after stroke.
    Author: Chen Q, Shen W, Sun H, Zhang H, Liu C, Chen Z, Yu L, Cai X, Ke J, Li L, Zhang L, Fang Q.
    Journal: Brain Res; 2022 Sep 01; 1790():147959. PubMed ID: 35654120.
    Abstract:
    Neural plasticity is a major factor driving cortical reorganization after stroke. This study aimed to evaluate functional connectivity (FC) changes in the cortical motor network after coupled inhibitory-facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment and to assess the correlation between FC changes and functional recovery, further characterizing the neural mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of rTMS. We randomly divided 63 patients with acute stroke into four groups: (1) Group A received coupled inhibitory-facilitatory rTMS [1 Hz over the contralesional primary motor cortex (M1) and 10 Hz over ipsilesional M1]; (2) Group B received a contralesional sham stimulation and ipsilesional 10 Hz stimulation; (3) Group C received a contralesional 1 Hz rTMS and ipsilesional sham stimulation; and (4) Group D received bilateral sham stimulation only. Standardized rehabilitation therapy was performed immediately after rTMS, and each group was treated with their respective treatment modalities for 4 weeks. Twenty-four hours before and after the intervention, participants underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Additional functional assessments were conducted at baseline, after treatment, and at the 3 month follow-up. The rTMS treatment significantly changed the FCs of intra- and inter-hemispheric cortical motor networks in the rTMS groups (A and B) compared with the sham group (Group D). This effect was more pronounced in Group A, which displayed a changed FC between the contralesional postcentral gyrus and contralesional superior parietal gyrus, between the contralesional precentral gyrus and contralesional postcentral gyrus, and between the ipsilesional postcentral gyrus and contralesional superior parietal gyrus, when compared with Groups B and C. Importantly, FC changes were significantly correlated with improvement of motor function. In the early stages of ischemic stroke, coupled rTMS was more conducive to motor recovery by modulating the FCs of intra-hemispheric and inter-hemispheric motor networks. Our results suggested that FC changes were related to motor function recovery for early-stage cerebral stroke patients treated with coupled rTMS. These findings could help to understand the mechanism of coupled rTMS and further the use of this therapy as an adjunct rehabilitation technique in motor recovery.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]