These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Risk of ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction in operatively treated early onset spinal deformity.
    Author: Johnson MA, Lott C, Kennedy BC, Heuer GG, Cahill PJ, Anari JB.
    Journal: Spine Deform; 2022 Nov; 10(6):1467-1472. PubMed ID: 35661994.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement is a common neurosurgical procedure performed in patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS). To provide insight into the risks of spine lengthening operations, we investigate the rate of VP shunt complications in patients with EOS undergoing spinal deformity correction interventions. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients with EOS at a single institution undergoing spinal deformity correction procedures from 2007 to 2018. Patients having undergone VP shunt implantation prior to deformity correction were included. A minimum of 2-year follow-up was required for inclusion. Clinical records and imaging studies were reviewed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients with VP shunts underwent Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (VEPTR) implantation for treatment of early onset spinal deformity. The mean age at shunt placement and spine instrumentation surgery was 13.7 months (1 day to 13 years) and 6.1 years (0.5-15.1) respectively. The diagnoses associated with shunt implantation were: 12 spina bifida, 3 structural defects or obstructions, 2 intraventricular hemorrhage, 1 cerebral palsy, and 1 campomelic dwarfism. During the first 2 years following rib-based insertion, there was a mean of 2.5 expansion/revision procedures (0-5) with no shunt-related complications. The mean length of follow-up in this series was 7.0 years (2.6-13.2). A total of three (16%) patients required shunt revision following their rib-based device insertion, two patients with proximal shunt malfunctions and one with a mid-catheter breakage, at 2.4, 2.6, and 5.6 years, respectively, after rod implantation (Fig. 2). Each of these shunt revisions occurred more than 50 days following an expansion procedure (1.9, 2.9, and 5.7 months, respectively). CONCLUSION: Growing instrumentation procedures in EOS are associated with low risk for post-operative shunt complications in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. There were no shunt revision procedures performed in the first 2 years following rib-based device insertion. Sixteen percent of patients went on to require a shunt revision at some point during their follow-up, which is comparable to the baseline rate of shunt revision in non-EOS patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Case series.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]