These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Cranial suture morphometry and mechanical response to loading: 2D vs. 3D assumptions and characterization.
    Author: Remesz R, Khurelbaatar T, Grotski M, Popowics T, Rafferty K, Herring SW, Addison O, Doschak MR, Romanyk DL.
    Journal: Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2022 Aug; 21(4):1251-1265. PubMed ID: 35666355.
    Abstract:
    Cranial sutures are complex soft tissue structures whose mechanics are often studied due to their link with bone growth in the skull. Researchers will often use a cross-sectional two-dimensional slice to define suture geometry when studying morphometry and/or mechanical response to loading. However, using a single cross section neglects the full suture complexity and may introduce significant errors when defining their form. This study aims to determine trends in suture path variability through skull thickness in a swine model and the implications of using a 'representative' cross section on mechanical modeling. To explore these questions, a mixture of quantitative analysis of computed tomography images and finite element models was used. The linear interdigitation and width of coronal and sagittal sutures were analyzed on offset transverse planes through the skull thickness. It was found that sagittal suture width and interdigitation were largely consistent through the skull thickness, whereas the coronal suture showed significant variation in both. The finite element study found that average values of displacement and strain were similar between the two-dimensionally variable and three-dimensionally variable models. Larger ranges and more complex distributions of strain were found in the three-dimensionally variable model. Outcomes of this study indicate that the appropriateness of using a representative cross section to describe suture morphometry and predict mechanical response should depend on specific research questions and goals. Two-dimensional approximations can be sufficient for less-interdigitated sutures and when bulk site mechanics are of interest, while taking the true three-dimensional geometry into account is necessary when considering spatial variability and local mechanical response.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]