These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Postcountershock pulseless rhythms: hemodynamic effects of glucagon in a canine model. Author: Niemann JT, Haynes KS, Garner D, Jagels G, Rennie CJ. Journal: Crit Care Med; 1987 Jun; 15(6):554-8. PubMed ID: 3568724. Abstract: Defibrillation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF) is frequently followed by asystole or electromechanical dissociation (EMD) which are usually fatal. We studied the effects of glucagon, a known inotropic and chronotropic agent, during 19 episodes of postcountershock asystole/EMD in nine dogs. Systolic and diastolic aortic (Ao), left ventricular, pulmonary arterial, and right atrial (RA) pressures were recorded as was the instantaneous Ao-RA difference (coronary perfusion pressure) and coronary sinus blood flow (CSF) during closed-chest CPR. VF was induced electrically; 2 min later, a 400-J transthoracic shock was given. Countershock was always followed by asystole (n = 12) or EMD (n = 7). Conventional closed-chest CPR with a mechanical device was begun 30 to 60 sec after countershock and continued for 2 to 3 min. If a perfusing rhythm did not occur, glucagon (1 mg) was given iv and CPR continued for 2 to 3 min more. Glucagon had no significant effect on intravascular pressures, the coronary perfusion gradient, or CSF when compared to CPR alone. However, in 14 or 19 postcountershock episodes unresponsive to CPR alone, glucagon restored effective spontaneous circulation, i.e., successful cardiac resuscitation, due to its effects on the intrinsic pacemaker discharge rate. Glucagon has been previously shown to stimulate myocardial adenyl cyclase via nonadrenergic mechanisms. We conclude that when postcountershock asystole/EMD occurs, glucagon has a direct and favorable effect on cardiac resuscitation outcome due to its effects on pacemaker discharge rate which is not mediated by changes in myocardial blood flow or coronary perfusion pressure.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]