These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Is a single late SPECT/CT based kidney 177Lu-dosimetry superior to hybrid dosimetry with sequential multiple time-point whole-body planar scans in combination with an early SPECT/CT?
    Author: Beykan S, Tran-Gia J, Borup Jensen S, Lassmann M.
    Journal: Phys Med; 2022 Aug; 100():39-50. PubMed ID: 35724608.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The aim is to assess the impact of different imaging-protocols on image-based kidney dosimetry in 177Lu labelled peptide receptor radiotherapies. METHODS: Kidney data of five [177Lu]Lu-OPS201 injected pigs and a 3D printed phantom were used for comparing the absorbed doses and time-integrated activity coefficients calculated based on the following imaging-protocols: A-) multiple time-point SPECT/CTs, B-) multiple time-point planar scans in combination with one SPECT/CT, C-) single time-point SPECT/CT. In addition, the influence of late scan time-points on kidney dosimetry was investigated by sequentially eliminating scan data at > 100 h from the pig/phantom datasets for imaging-protocols A and B. RESULTS: Compared to imaging-protocol A, absorbed doses based on imaging-protocols B and C (scans at > 24 h post-injection) were always lower (differences > 34%). The best agreement in absorbed dose was achieved by imaging-protocol C at ∼ 100 h post-injection (difference: 4%). Regarding the phantom/pig experiments, eliminating scan data at > 100 h post-injection increased the time-integrated activity coefficients calculated based on imaging-protocols A and B by up to 83%. CONCLUSION: While imaging-protocol A is accurate if scans at >∼100 h are included, it is time-consuming. In addition to being time-consuming, imaging-protocol B shows high differences associated with organ-count overlay, a lack of accuracy concerning the geometric mean based 2D attenuation correction, and 2D background subtraction due to the inhomogeneous and time-varying background contributions. Our findings indicate that dosimetry based on imaging-protocol C, if appropriately performed, provides similar kidney absorbed doses compared to imaging-protocol A, while only a single scan time-point is necessary.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]