These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Treatment of cryptoglandular fistulas with the fistula tract laser closure (FiLaC™) method in comparison with standard methods: first results of a multicenter retrospective comparative study in the Netherlands.
    Author: Sluckin TC, Gispen WH, Jongenotter J, Hazen SJA, Smeets S, van der Bilt JDW, Smeenk RM, Schouten R.
    Journal: Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Oct; 26(10):797-803. PubMed ID: 35749023.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Current surgical closure techniques for sphincter-sparing treatment of high cryptoglandular fistulas in the Netherlands include the mucosal advancement flap procedure (MAF) and ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT). A relatively novel treatment is the fistula tract laser closure (FiLaC™) method. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in healing and recurrence rates between FiLaC™ and current standard practices. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included both primary and recurrent high cryptoglandular anorectal fistulas, treated with either FiLaC™ or standard methods (MAF or LIFT) between September 2015 and July 2020. Patients with extrasphincteric fistulas, Crohn's disease, multiple fistulas, age < 18 years or missing data regarding healing time or recurrence were excluded. The primary outcomes were the clinical primary and secondary healing and recurrence rates. Primary healing was defined as a closed external opening without fluid discharge within 6 months of treatment on examination, while secondary healing was the same endpoint after secondary treatment. Secondary outcomes included healing time and complaints. RESULTS: A total of 162 high fistulas from 3 Dutch hospitals were included. Ninety-nine high fistulas were treated with FiLaC™ and 63 with either MAF or LIFT. There were no significant differences between FiLaC™ and MAF/LIFT in terms of clinical healing (55.6% versus 58.7%, p = .601), secondary healing (70.0% versus 69.2%, p = .950) or recurrence rates (49.5% versus 54%, p = .420), respectively. Median follow-up duration was 7.1 months in the FiLaC™ group (interquartile range [IQR] 4.1-14.4 months) versus 6 months in the control group (IQR 3.5-8.1 months). CONCLUSIONS: FiLaC™ treatment of high anorectal fistulas does not appear to be inferior to MAF or LIFT. Based on these preliminary results, FiLaC™ can be considered as a worthwhile treatment option for high cryptoglandular fistulas. Prospective studies with a longer follow-up period and well-determined postoperative parameters such as complication rates, magnetic resonance imaging for confirmation of fistula healing, incontinence and quality of life are warranted.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]