These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Sex-specific effects of localized muscle fatigue on upper body kinematics during a repetitive pointing task.
    Author: Yang C, Côté JN.
    Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jun 27; 23(1):613. PubMed ID: 35761276.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Females are reported to have a higher risk of musculoskeletal disorders than males. Repetitive motions can lead to muscle fatigue, which may play a mediator role in the development of musculoskeletal disorders. However, sex differences in adaptations to localized fatigue at different joints are poorly understood. We examined the sex-specific effects of fatigue location on shoulder, elbow and spinal joint angles, and angular variabilities during a repetitive pointing task. METHODS: Seven males and ten females performed a 30-s standing repetitive pointing task with their right upper limb when they were non-fatigued (NF), elbow-fatigued (EF), shoulder-fatigued (SF) and trunk-fatigued (TF), while trunk and upper body tridimensional kinematic data was recorded. Joint angles and angular variabilities of shoulder, elbow, upper thoracic spine, lower thoracic spine, and lumbar spine were calculated. RESULTS: Results showed that shoulder angles changed the most after EF in males, but after SF in females. The similarities between sexes were that SF increased the variabilities at upper (lateral flexion: 0.15° greater than NF, rotation: 0.26° greater than all other conditions) and lower thoracic spine (lateral flexion: 0.13° greater than NF, rotation: averagely 0.1° greater than all other condition) in both sexes. TF altered upper thoracic spine variability (0.36° smaller than SF), lower thoracic spine angle (lateral flexion: 3.00° greater than NF, rotation: 1.68° greater than SF), and lumbar angle (averagely 1.8° smaller than all other conditions) in both sexes. However, females had greater lower thoracic spine angle (lateral flexion: 8.3° greater, p = 0.005) as well as greater upper (rotation: 0.53° greater, p = 0.006) and lower thoracic spine (rotation: 0.5° greater, p = 0.007; flexion: 0.6° greater, p = 0.014) angular variabilities than males. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that females' fatigue responses focused on the trunk and spine. Results highlight a few sex differences in adapting to localized muscle fatigue, which may help explain how sex differences in repetitive motion-related injuries differ between joints.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]