These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Risk factors for delayed milk ejection in Holstein dairy cows milked 3 times per day.
    Author: Wieland M, Watters RD, Virkler PD, Sipka AS.
    Journal: J Dairy Sci; 2022 Aug; 105(8):6936-6946. PubMed ID: 35773032.
    Abstract:
    Delayed milk ejection, manifested most often as bimodal milk flow, occurs when the cisternal milk fraction is removed before the alveolar milk reaches the gland cistern. It is thought to be a consequence of not meeting cows' physiological needs, due to insufficient premilking teat stimulation, inadequate timing of milking unit attachment, or both. It has been associated with decreased milking efficiency, reduced milk yield, and impaired teat and udder health. Traditionally, portable electronic milk meters have been used to assess the presence of delayed milk ejection in dairy cows. By contrast, incremental milk flow rates from on-farm milk meters and their suitability as a measure to assess delayed milk ejection have not been studied by rigorous methods. The objectives were (1) to describe a protocol for identification of cows with chronically delayed milk ejection (CDME) and (2) to investigate risk factors for CDME using incremental milk flow rates obtained from automated on-farm milk meters. In a retrospective case control study, milk flow data from a 4,300-cow dairy with a thrice-daily milking schedule were obtained over a 1-wk period. Incremental milk flow rates (0-15 s, 15-30 s, 30-60 s, and 60-120 s) were used to identify cows with delayed milk ejection. Cases of CDME were defined as presence of delayed milk ejection at all 21 milking observations. Cows that had no delayed milk ejection at any of the same 21 milking observations were included as controls. A total of 171 cases and 393 controls were included in the study based on these criteria. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate associations of the following risk factors with CDME: parity (1, 2, ≥3), stage of lactation (<100, 101-200, >200 DIM), presence of a nonlactating quarter, milk somatic cell count, average daily milk production, and health and management events. Parity and CDME were associated such that compared with cows in their third or greater lactation, the odds (95% confidence intervals, 95% CI) of CDME were 1.27 (0.71-2.25) for cows in their first and 4.77 (2.47-9.22) for animals in their second lactation. The odds of CDME increased with increasing stage of lactation, with an odds ratio of 0.20 (0.11-0.36) for early and 0.28 (0.15-0.52) for mid-lactation animals, respectively, compared with late lactation cows. A 1-kg increase in average daily milk production was associated with decreased odds of CDME [odds ratio (95% CI): 0.89 (0.87-0.92)]. A lameness event during the study period increased the odds of CDME [odds ratio (95% CI): 8.04 (1.20-53.83)], as did a vaccination event 1 wk before the study period [odds ratio (95% CI): 4.07 (0.99-16.71)]. This study confirmed associations between CDME and previously reported risk factors and identified several previously less rigorously investigated health and management events that could be associated with CDME. Incremental milk flow rates from individual cows serve as an automated tool to evaluate milk flow dynamics. This information could be used to improve individual premilking udder preparation to meet the animal's physiological requirements, improve teat and udder health, and enhance parlor efficiency.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]