These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Agreement and accuracy of shear-wave techniques (point shear-wave elastography and 2D-shear-wave elastography) using transient elastography as reference.
    Author: Fernandes F, Piedade J, Freitas G, Area P, Santos R, Grinsztejn B, Veloso V, Pereira G, Perazzo H.
    Journal: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Aug 01; 34(8):873-881. PubMed ID: 35802529.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the agreement/accuracy of point shear-wave elastography (p-SWE) and 2D-shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE) for liver fibrosis staging using transient elastography (TE) as the reference. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data from people with chronic liver diseases submitted to TE, p-SWE, and 2D-SWE. Liver fibrosis stages were defined using the TE's 'rule of five': normal (<5 kPa); suggestive of compensated-advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) (10-15 kPa); highly suggestive of cACLD (15-20 kPa); suggestive of clinically significant portal hypertension (>20 kPa). Agreement and accuracy of p-SWE and 2D-SWE were assessed. Optimal cutoffs for p-SWE and 2D-SWE were identified using the point nearest to the upper left corner of the ROC curves. RESULTS: A total of 289 participants were included. The correlation between TE and 2D-SWE (rho = 0.59; P < 0.001) or p-SWE (rho = 0.69; P < 0.001) was satisfactory. The AUROCs (95% CI) of 2D-SWE and p-SWE for TE ≥ 5 kPa; TE ≥ 10 kPa; TE ≥ 15 kPa and TE ≥ 20 kPa were 0.757 (0.685-0.829) and 0.741 (0.676-0.806); 0.819 (0.770-0.868) and 0.870 (0.825-0.915); 0.848 (0.803-0.893) and 0.952 (0.927-0.978); 0.851 (0.806-0.896) and 0.951 (0.920-0.982), respectively. AUROCs of 2D-SWE were significantly lower compared with p-SWE for detecting cACLD. Optimal thresholds of 2D-SWE and p-SWE for TE ≥ 15 kPa were 8.82 kPa (sensitivity = 86% and specificity = 79%) and 8.86 kPa (sensitivity = 90% and specificity = 92%), respectively. CONCLUSION: LSM by p-SWE and 2D-SWE techniques were correlated with TE. LSM by p-SWE seems to be more accurate than 2D-SWE to identify patients with more advanced fibrosis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]