These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Epstein-Barr virus (Herpesviridae: Gammaherpesvirinae: Lymphocryptovirus: Human gammaherpesvirus 4) in Kalmyks and Slavs living in Russia: virus types, LMP1 oncogene variants, and malignancies].
    Author: Gurtsevitch VE, Lubenskaya AK, Senyuta NB, Dushenkina TE, Smirnova KV.
    Journal: Vopr Virusol; 2022 Jul 14; 67(3):246-257. PubMed ID: 35831967.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: The discovery of the Epstein-Barr virus types (Herpesviridae: Gammaherpesvirinae: Lymphocryptovirus: Human gammaherpesvirus 4) (EBV) - EBV-1 and EBV-2, which have different transforming abilities in vitro, stimulated the study of their prevalence in populations in order to elucidate the relationship with malignant neoplasms.The aims of the work are to study the prevalence of EBV-1 and EBV-2 among representatives of 2 ethnic groups of Russia, Kalmyks and Slavs, sequencing analysis of the LMP1 oncogene in virus isolates, and analysis of the correlation between virus types and the incidence of certain forms of tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DNA samples were isolated from the biological material of oral swabs obtained from ethnic Kalmyks of the Republic of Kalmykia (RK) (n = 50) and Slavs, residents of the Moscow Region (MR) (n = 40). DNA samples were used to amplify EBV DNA, followed by determination of its concentration per 1 cell of washout, amplification of the LMP1 oncogene in viral samples, their sequencing, and determination of LMP1 protein variants. RESULTS: It has been established that with the same burden of EBV among representatives of both ethnic groups in the Kalmyk group, the ratio of persons infected with transforming and non-transforming types of the virus was almost the same (EBV-1 - 51%; and EBV-2 - 49%). Meanwhile, in the group of Slavs the transforming EBV-1 type virus dominated (80.6%). The predominance of EBV-1 type in representatives of the Slavs correlated with increased incidence of certain forms of tumors in the population of the MR when compared with similar values in the population of the RK, where both types of the virus were prevalent. Differences between the compared rates of cancer incidence were not statistically significant. Analysis of viral isolates showed a similar set of LMP1 variants in both ethnic groups. CONCLUSION: In order to establish the influence of EBV types on the incidence of malignant tumors, additional studies involving representatives of various ethnic groups from different geographical regions are needed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]