These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparative effects of verapamil, diltiazem and felodipine during experimental digitalis-induced arrhythmias.
    Author: Bush LR, Evans RM, Gaul SL, D'Alonzo AJ.
    Journal: Pharmacology; 1987; 34(2-3):111-20. PubMed ID: 3588655.
    Abstract:
    We compared the abilities of three different calcium (Ca2+) entry blockers, verapamil, diltiazem and felodipine to abolish ouabain-induced ventricular ectopy (100 X ectopic/total beats, VE) in anesthetized, closed-chest dogs. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) was produced in anesthetized, bilaterally vagotomized, closed-chest dogs by an average dose of 65 +/- 19 micrograms/kg ouabain. 30 min after establishing VT, either verapamil (25-50 micrograms/kg + 5-10 micrograms/kg/min), diltiazem (50-100 micrograms/kg + 20-50 micrograms/kg/min), felodipine (3 micrograms/kg + 0.3 micrograms/kg/min) or saline was administered for another 30 min. Verapamil, at the higher dose utilized, practically abolished ouabain-induced VT (97 +/- 3 to 8 +/- 19% VE); diltiazem was moderately effective (96 +/- 4 to 50 +/- 8% ectopy) at 100 micrograms/kg, and felodipine exerted no antiarrhythmic effects in this model. All three Ca2+ entry blockers lowered mean aortic pressure, felodipine lowering this parameter most prominently. Thus, these structurally and electrophysiologically dissimilar Ca2+ entry blockers differed in their abilities to abolish the digitalis glycoside-induced arrhythmias in vivo. The superiority of verapamil may be related to its multiple, additional electrophysiologic effects.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]