These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Clinical significance of early diastolic time intervals for the differentiation of idiopathic dilative cardiomyopathy from ischemic cardiomyopathy.
    Author: Sekiya M, Hamada M, Kokubu T.
    Journal: Clin Cardiol; 1987 Jun; 10(6):303-8. PubMed ID: 3594952.
    Abstract:
    In order to differentiate idiopathic dilative cardiomyopathy from ischemic cardiomyopathy noninvasively, systolic time intervals (STIs) and early diastolic time intervals were investigated in patients with idiopathic dilative cardiomyopathy (n = 11), patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 8), and normal controls (n = 17). Minimal left ventricular pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) were also measured to clarify the relationship between early diastolic time intervals and early diastolic hemodynamics. Cardiac function estimated by STIs was markedly depressed both in idiopathic dilative cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy, and there was no difference between the two diseases. In early diastolic time intervals, IIA-O time (the interval from the aortic component of the second heart sound to the O point of apexcardiogram) was significantly prolonged both in idiopathic dilative cardiomyopathy (144 +/- 31 (SD); p less than 0.01) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (153 +/- 15; p less than 0.01) compared to normal controls (126 +/- 11). IIA-MVO time (the interval from IIA to the mitral valve opening) in idiopathic dilative cardiomyopathy (49 +/- 23) was significantly shorter than that in normal controls (70 +/- 8; p less than 0.05). On the contrary, IIA-MVO time in ischemic cardiomyopathy (126 +/- 11) was markedly prolonged compared with normal controls (p less than 0.01) and idiopathic dilative cardiomyopathy (p less than 0.01). MVO-O time was significantly prolonged in idiopathic dilative cardiomyopathy (94 +/- 18; p less than 0.01). However, it was conversely shortened in ischemic cardiomyopathy (25 +/- 15) compared with normal controls (54 +/- 7; p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]