These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Upper and lower body anaerobic power: comparison between biathletes and control subjects.
    Author: Patton JF, Duggan A.
    Journal: Int J Sports Med; 1987 Apr; 8(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 3596883.
    Abstract:
    This study compared power outputs (PO) from both the upper body (UB) and lower body (LB) Wingate tests of anaerobic power between biathletes and control subjects. Ten biathletes (B) selected by the British Ski Federation for potential assignment to the British team and 13 control (C) subjects cranked or pedaled the same Bodyguard ergometer at maximal RPMs for 30 s against resistances of 2.94 and 4.41 J/rev/kg body weight (BW), respectively. POs were calculated in watts (W) and expressed as peak power (PP, highest 5-s interval), mean power (MP, the mean for 30 s), and power decrease (PD, difference between PP and lowest 5-s PO divided by time). Absolute PP and MP for both UB and LB did not differ between groups. A comparison of POs made relative to BW showed B to have higher values than C: 11.25 vs 10.25 W/kg for LB PP (P less than .05) and 9.21 vs 7.96 W/kg for LB MP (P less than .001). The data expressed relative to kg fat free mass (FFM) showed only MP to be significantly greater in B compared with C (P less than .001). Similar PO relationships were found for the UB where PP (P less than .01) and MP (P less than .001) expressed per kg BW and MP (P less than .001) expressed per kg FFM were higher for B than C. Concomitantly, PD was lower in B than C for both the UB (P less than .05) and LB (P less than .01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]