These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Assessing male gamete genome integrity to ameliorate poor assisted reproductive technology clinical outcome.
    Author: Kocur OM, Xie P, Souness S, Cheung S, Rosenwaks Z, Palermo GD.
    Journal: F S Sci; 2023 Feb; 4(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 35973556.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of evaluating sperm chromatin fragmentation (SCF) as a tool to guide treatment in couples who achieved unexpectedly poor clinical outcomes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). DESIGN: We identified couples with an unexpectedly suboptimal clinical outcome after ICSI who were then screened for SCF. Consequently, the same couples were counseled to undergo a subsequent ICSI cycle using either ejaculates processed by microfluidic sperm selection (MFSS) or spermatozoa retrieved from the testis, and clinical outcomes were compared between history and treatment cycles. To confirm the sole effect of a compromised male gamete, we compared the ICSI outcome in cycles where male gametes with abnormal SCF were used to inseminate autologous and donor oocytes. Finally, to eliminate an eventual confounding female factor component, we compared the clinical outcome of ICSI cycles using sibling donor oocytes injected with spermatozoa with normal or abnormal SCF. SETTING: Academic reproductive medicine center point of care. PATIENT(S): The patient population consisted of 76 couples with reproductively healthy and relatively young female partners and male partners with compromised semen parameters, but suitable for ICSI. In a subanalysis, we identified 67 couples with abnormal SCF who underwent ICSI cycle(s) with donor oocytes. Furthermore, we identified 29 couples, 12 with normal SCF and 17 with abnormal, uncorrected SCF, and 7 couples with abnormal, corrected SCF vs. a control, who used sibling donor oocytes for their ICSI cycle(s). INTERVENTION(S): For couples who resulted in surprisingly low clinical outcomes after ICSI, despite semen parameters adequate for ICSI and a normal female infertility evaluation, a SCF assessment was performed on the semen specimen using the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated fluorescein-deoxyuridine triphosphate nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay. The couples then underwent a subsequent ICSI cycle with spermatozoa processed by MFSS or surgically retrieved. Moreover, cycles with donor oocytes were used to confirm the sole contribution of the male gamete. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical outcomes, such as fertilization, embryo implantation, clinical pregnancy, delivery, and pregnancy loss rates were compared between history and treatment cycle(s) using ejaculated spermatozoa selected by MFSS or from a testicular biopsy, taking into consideration the level of SCF. In a subanalysis, we reported the clinical outcomes of 67 patients who used donor oocytes and compared them with cycles where their own oocytes were used. Furthermore, we compared the ICSI clinical outcomes between cycles using sibling donor oocytes injected with low or high SCF with or without sperm intervention aimed at correcting, or alleviating the degree of SCF. RESULT(S): In a total of 168 cycles, 76 couples had in a prior cycle a 67.1% fertilization rate, and clinical pregnancy and pregnancy loss rates of 16.6% and 52.3%, respectively. After testing for SCF, the DNA fragmentation rate was 21.6%. This led to a subsequent ICSI cycle with MFSS or testicular sperm extraction, resulting in clinical pregnancy and delivery rates of 39.2%, and 37.3%, respectively. The embryo implantation rate increased to 23.5%, whereas the pregnancy loss rate decreased to 5% in the treatment cycle. This was particularly significant in the moderate SCF group, reaching embryo implantation, clinical pregnancy, and delivery rates of 24.3%, 40.4%, and 36.2%, respectively, and reducing the pregnancy loss rate to 10.5% in post-sperm treatment cycles. In 67 patients with high SCF who used donor oocytes, a significantly higher fertilization rate of 78.1% and embryo implantation rate of 29.1% were reported, compared with those in couples also with an elevated SCF who used their own. Interestingly, the clinical pregnancy and delivery rates only increased slightly from 28.0%-36.1% and from 23.7%-29.2%, respectively. To further control for a female factor, we observed couples who shared sibling donor oocytes, 17 with normal SCF and 12 with abnormal (uncorrected) SCF. Interestingly, the abnormal SCF group had impaired fertilization (69.3%), embryo implantation (15.0%), and delivery (15.4%) rates. For an additional 15 couples who split their donor oocytes, 8 had normal SCF, and although 7 couples originally had abnormal SCF, 4 used microfluidic processing, 2 used testicular spermatozoa, and 1 used donor spermatozoa to alleviate the degree of SCF, resulting in comparable clinical outcomes with the normal SCF group. CONCLUSION(S): A superimposed male factor component may explain the disappointing ICSI outcome in some couples despite reproductively healthy female partners. Therefore, it may be useful to screen couples for SCF to guide treatment options and maximize chances of a successful pregnancy. The improved, but suboptimal pregnancy and delivery outcomes observed in couples using donor oocytes confirmed the exclusive detrimental role that the male gamete exerted on embryo development despite the presence of putative oocyte repair mechanisms.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]