These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Enhance Cognition in Stroke: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Author: Ko MH, Yoon JY, Jo YJ, Son MN, Kim DS, Kim GW, Won YH, Park SH, Seo JH, Kim YH.
    Journal: Stroke; 2022 Oct; 53(10):2992-3001. PubMed ID: 35975663.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising tool for improving poststroke cognitive function. Home-based rehabilitation is increasingly required for patients with stroke, and additional benefits are expected if supplemented with remotely supervised tDCS (RS-tDCS). We evaluated the cognitive improvement effect and feasibility of RS-tDCS in patients with chronic stroke. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with chronic stroke and cognitive impairment (Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment [K-MoCA] score <26) were randomized into real and sham RS-tDCS groups and underwent concurrent computerized cognitive training and RS-tDCS. Patients and caregivers underwent training to ensure correct tDCS self-application, were monitored, and treated 5 d/wk for 4 weeks. We investigated several cognition tests including K-MoCA, Korean version of the Dementia Rating Scale-2, Korean-Boston Naming Test, Trail Making Test, Go/No Go, and Controlled Oral Word Association Test at the end of the training sessions and one month later. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used for comparison between the groups and within each group. The adherence rate of the appropriate RS-tDCS session was also investigated. RESULTS: In within-group comparison, unlike the sham group, the real group showed significant improvement in K-MoCA (Preal=0.004 versus Psham=0.132), particularly in patients with lower baseline K-MoCA (K-MoCA10-17; Preal=0.001 versus Psham=0.835, K-MoCA18-25; Preal=0.060 versus Psham=0.064) or with left hemispheric lesions (left; Preal=0.010 versus Psham=0.454, right; Preal=0.106 versus Psham=0.128). In between-group comparison, a significant difference was observed in K-MoCA in the lower baseline K-MoCA subgroup (K-MoCA10-17; Ptime×group=0.048), but no significant difference was found in other cognitive tests. The adherence rate of successful application of the RS-tDCS was 98.4%, and no serious adverse effects were detected. CONCLUSIONS: RS-tDCS is a safe and feasible rehabilitation modality for poststroke cognitive dysfunction. Specifically, RS-tDCS is effective in patients with moderate cognitive decline. Additionally, these data demonstrate the potential to enhance home-based cognitive training, although significant differences were not consistently found in between-group comparisons; therefore, further larger studies are needed. REGISTRATION: URL: https://cris.nih.go.kr; Unique identifier: KCT0003427.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]