These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Surfactant associated protein (SAP-35) in amniotic fluid from diabetic and nondiabetic pregnancies.
    Author: McMahan MJ, Mimouni F, Miodovnik M, Hull WM, Whitsett JA.
    Journal: Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jul; 70(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 3601273.
    Abstract:
    We have recently shown that, with the current management of insulin-dependent diabetes during pregnancy, infants of diabetic mothers are at no greater risk of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) than an appropriately matched control population. A previous study suggested a selective inhibition of surfactant associated protein of 35,000 daltons (SAP-35) in the amniotic fluid of diabetic pregnancies. In order to determine whether a selective inhibition of SAP-35 occurs in well controlled, insulin-dependent diabetic pregnancies, we compared SAP-35 concentration and lecithin/sphingomyelin (L/S) ratios in amniotic fluid from 30 well controlled, insulin-dependent women with 30 nondiabetic pregnant women pair-matched for gestational age, race, and indication for amniocentesis. Gestational ages ranged from 30-43 weeks, with a mean of 36.5 +/- 2.5 weeks, in both groups. Surfactant associated protein-35 was measured by an enzyme-linked capture immunoassay specific for SAP-35 and its oligomers. Mean +/- SEM SAP-35 was 3.7 +/- 0.4 micrograms/mL (N = 30) in the diabetic group, not significantly different from 5.0 +/- 1.1 micrograms/mL (N = 30) in the control group (P greater than .05). Mean L/S ratios were also not different: 2.4 +/- 0.1 (diabetic) compared with 2.3 +/- 0.1 (control); P greater than .05. The rate of RDS was similar in both groups. We conclude that in well controlled diabetic pregnancies, fetal lung maturation, as assessed by the L/S ratio, SAP-35 concentration, and outcome, is not adversely affected.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]