These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Taurolidine-related adverse events in patients on home parenteral nutrition frequently indicate catheter-related problems.
    Author: Korzilius JW, Gillis VELM, Wouters Y, Wanten GJA.
    Journal: Clin Nutr; 2022 Oct; 41(10):2178-2184. PubMed ID: 36067590.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND & AIMS: A catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is a serious complication of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) treatment. Despite taurolidine's frequent use as catheter lock solution (CLS) to prevent CRBSIs and its presumed favourable safety profile, data on taurolidine-related adverse events (AEs) and the clinical implications thereof remain merely anecdotal. Aim of this study was to explore taurolidine-related AEs in our large cohort of HPN patients and to develop an algorithm on how to deal with these AEs in clinical practice. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study comprised all adult HPN patients who used taurolidine as a CLS between 2006 and 2021 at our national HPN referral centre. Primary outcome was to identify taurolidine-related AEs. Secondary outcomes were median time to a taurolidine-related AEs and development of a clinical algorithm. A taurolidine-related AE was defined as an event that occurred directly after instillation of taurolidine in the CVAD or at start of fluid/PN infusion. RESULTS: In total, 470 patients used taurolidine during 700.232 catheter days. In 89 (19%) patients, 103 mild- to severe AEs related to taurolidine were observed. Six patients developed an allergic reaction. Reported AEs compromised vascular access device-related problems (group A) or taurolidine-related problems (group B) in 53 (51%) and 50 (49%), patients, respectively. In groups A and B, 51 (85%) and 21 (18%) patients presented with taurolidine infusion-related pain. Upon rechallenge, 45 (85%) and 16 (32%) patients, respectively, successfully resumed taurolidine locking without residual symptoms. CONCLUSION: In this study, use of taurolidine as CLS was generally safe. Most reported AEs were vascular access device-related, and the majority of symptoms concerned pain. Upon rechallenge, a substantial number of patients, especially those in whom pain was the main symptom, could resume CLS locking after addressing the underlying catheter-related problem. Based on these results, we present a clinical algorithm for patients with possible taurolidine-related symptoms.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]