These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: T2 Turbo Spin Echo With Compressed Sensing and Propeller Acquisition (Sampling k-Space by Utilizing Rotating Blades) for Fast and Motion Robust Prostate MRI: Comparison With Conventional Acquisition.
    Author: Bischoff LM, Katemann C, Isaak A, Mesropyan N, Wichtmann B, Kravchenko D, Endler C, Kuetting D, Pieper CC, Ellinger J, Weber O, Attenberger U, Luetkens JA.
    Journal: Invest Radiol; 2023 Mar 01; 58(3):209-215. PubMed ID: 36070533.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare a new compressed sensing (CS) method for T2-weighted propeller acquisitions (T2 CS ) with conventional T2-weighted propeller sequences (T2 conv ) in terms of achieving a higher image quality, while reducing the acquisition time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male participants with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer were prospectively enrolled and underwent prostate magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T. Axial and sagittal images of the T2 conv sequence and the T2 CS sequence were acquired. Sequences were qualitatively assessed by 2 blinded radiologists concerning artifacts, image-sharpness, lesion conspicuity, capsule delineation, and overall image quality using 5-point Likert items ranging from 1 (nondiagnostic) to 5 (excellent). The apparent signal-to-noise ratio and apparent contrast-to-noise ratio were evaluated. PI-RADS scores were assessed for both sequences. Statistical analysis was performed by using Wilcoxon signed rank test and paired samples t test. Intrarater and interrater reliability of qualitative image evaluation was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates. RESULTS: A total of 29 male participants were included (mean age, 66 ± 8 years). The acquisition time of the T2 CS sequence was respectively 26% (axial plane) and 24% (sagittal plane) shorter compared with the T2 conv sequence (eg, axial: 171 vs 232 seconds; P < 0.001). In the axial plane, the T2 CS sequence had fewer artifacts (4 [4-4.5] vs 4 [3-4]; P < 0.001), better image-sharpness (4 [4-4.5] vs 3 [3-3.5]; P < 0.001), better capsule delineation (4 [3-4] vs 3 [3-3.5]; P < 0.001), and better overall image quality (4 [4-4] vs 4 [3-4]; P < 0.001) compared with the T2 conv sequence. The ratings of lesion conspicuity were similar (4 [4-4] vs 4 [3-4]; P = 0.166). In the sagittal plane, the T2 CS sequence outperformed the T2 conv sequence in the categories artifacts (4 [4-4] vs 3 [3-4]; P < 0.001), image sharpness (4 [4-5] vs 4 [3-4]; P < 0.001), lesion conspicuity (4 [4-4] vs 4 [3-4]; P = 0.002), and overall image quality (4 [4-4] vs 4 [3-4]; P = 0.002). Capsule delineation was similar between both sequences (3 [3-4] vs 3 [3-3]; P = 0.07). Intraobserver and interobserver reliability for qualitative scoring were good (ICC intra: 0.92; ICC inter: 0.86). Quantitative analysis revealed a higher apparent signal-to-noise ratio (eg, axial: 52.2 ± 9.7 vs 22.8 ± 3.6; P < 0.001) and a higher apparent contrast-to-noise ratio (eg, axial: 44.0 ± 9.6 vs 18.6 ± 3.7; P ≤ 0.001) of the T2 CS sequence. PI-RADS scores were the same for both sequences in all participants. CONCLUSIONS: CS-accelerated T2-weighted propeller acquisition had a superior image quality compared with conventional T2-weighted propeller sequences while significantly reducing the acquisition time.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]