These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Sagittal Angle of the Trigeminal Nerve at the Porus Trigeminus: A Novel Measurement to Distinguish Different Causes of Classic Trigeminal Neuralgia.
    Author: Branstetter BF, Reddy N, Patel K, Sekula R.
    Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2022 Oct; 43(10):1460-1463. PubMed ID: 36109121.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Classic trigeminal neuralgia is a clinical syndrome of facial pain, most often attributable to vascular compression of the proximal cisternal segment of the trigeminal nerve and treatable with microvascular decompression of the nerve. Some patients, however, meet all clinical criteria for classic trigeminal neuralgia yet do not respond to microvascular decompression. Because the reasons for surgical failure are not well understood, the aim of this study was to determine if a subset of patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia could be distinguished by measuring the angle of the trigeminal nerve in the sagittal plane as the nerve traverses the porus trigeminus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with either classic trigeminal neuralgia (n = 300) or hemifacial spasm (n = 300) who had undergone MR imaging, including 3-plane steady-state free precession imaging. Patients with hemifacial spasm served as controls. On sagittal steady-state free precession images, we measured the angle of each trigeminal nerve as it crosses through the porus trigeminus into the Meckel cave (SATNaPT). In patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia, we separated the nerves into symptomatic and asymptomatic sides. We compared these 3 groups using the Student t test. RESULTS: Control patients had a mean SATNaPT of 170° (SD, 11°) with a normal distribution. The contralateral asymptomatic nerve in patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia had the same distribution of angles. The symptomatic nerves in patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia had a bimodal distribution; 83% of patients fell into the same distribution as the asymptomatic nerves, but the other 15% had an average angle of 143° (SD, 7°). This difference was statistically significant (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with the clinical syndrome of classic trigeminal neuralgia fell into 2 categories based on the radiologic measurement of the SATNaPT. Most patients had an anatomically normal nerve that was affected by vascular compression, but 17% of these patients had aberrant anatomy that may cause or contribute to their clinical presentation. Further study is needed to determine whether this subset of patients should receive a different surgery to better address their underlying anatomic abnormality. The SATNaPT measurement should be included in every MR imaging interpretation performed on patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]