These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Multi-year comparison of VITEK® MS and 16S rRNA gene sequencing performance for the identification of rarely encountered anaerobes causing invasive human infections in a large Canadian region: can our laboratory abandon 16S rRNA gene sequencing?
    Author: Church DL, Griener T, Gregson D.
    Journal: Anaerobe; 2022 Dec; 78():102640. PubMed ID: 36126828.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Our large regional laboratory routinely provides a definitive identification (ID) for 800-1,200 anaerobic bacteria per annum that cause invasive human infections. An increasing number of isolates (i.e., 10 to 13%) recovered from clinical specimens from these cases were more unusual or rarely isolated genera and/or species (i.e., ≤5 individual cases/annum). METHODS: VITEK® MS (MALDI-TOF MS) is done initially on all anaerobic bacteria, but rare isolates undergo in-house PCR/sequencing when proteomics provides a wrong ID or no results despite repeat testing. A clinical microbiologist in consultation with the Infectious Diseases service approves molecular analyses. This multi-year comparison (2014-19) of the performance of MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rRNA gene sequencing using the IDNS® SmartGene bacterial dataset shows both method's abilities to provide a genus-level and/or species-level ID for rare isolates. RESULTS: 489 rare anaerobes were recovered from a variety of clinical specimens: 57% blood cultures, 19% other sterile fluids, 14% sterile tissues, 8% deep wounds/abscesses, and 2% prosthetic implants. 16S rRNA gene sequencing gave an accurate genus-vs. species level ID for 487/489 (99.6%) and 401/489 (82.0%) of isolates respectively. Accurate genus-vs species-level ID were obtained by MALDI-TOF MS for 269/489 (53.4%) and 187/489 (37.3%) of isolates respectively. MALDI-TOF MS gave wrong or no results for 35.1% of Gram-negative anaerobic cocci (GNAC), 62% of Gram-negative anaerobic bacilli (GNAB), 30.8% of Gram-positive anaerobic cocci (GPAC) and 46.3% of Gram-positive anaerobic bacilli (GPAB). Neither method gave an ID for one GNAB and one GPAC isolate. MALDI-TOF MS genus-level ID of GNAC and genus/species-level ID of GPAB improved during the study but its performance remained stable for genus- or species-level ID of other organism groups. CONCLUSIONS: MALDI-TOF MS provides accurate ID for most common anaerobes, but molecular analyses need to be available for rare isolates. Large complex laboratories should have a workflow for sending rare isolates for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in invasive cases where a definitive ID is clinically required.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]