These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) analyses of breast lesions based on simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Author: Li X, Zhu H, Sun K, Chai W, Liu W, Grimm R, Fu C, Yan F.
    Journal: Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Dec; 94():119-126. PubMed ID: 36191856.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (SMS rs-EPI DWI), compared with readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (NOSMS rs-EPI DWI), in discriminating between benign and malignant breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated breast lesions from 185 consecutive patients who had undergone preoperative breast MRI. The NOSMS rs-EPI DWI and the prototype SMS rs-EPI DWI sequences were performed on a 1.5-T MR scanner. Two independent radiologists evaluated the image quality of the two sequences using a 5-point scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent) and then assessed the scores through visual grading characteristics analysis (VGC). The values of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and whole-tumor-based histogram parameter (ADCmedian) were compared between the two sequences using the Wilcoxon test. Then ROC curves were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The visual assessment showed that the SMS rs-EPI yielded superior overall image quality and lesion delineation than the NOSMS rs-EPI (AUCVGC = 0.980 and 0.984, respectively; all P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in relevant artifacts between the two sequences (AUCVGC = 0.531, P = 0.462). The SNR values for SMS rs-EPI DWI were significantly lower than for NOSMS rs-EPI DWI (P = 0.019) while there was no significant difference in CNR values between the two sequences (P = 0.955). In addition, evaluation of the diagnostic performance demonstrated that the difference in ADCmedian values for both DWI sequences between the malignant and benign lesions was statistically significant (P < 0.001). In contrast, the AUC for ADCmedian was higher with SMS rs-EPI than NOSMS rs-EPI (0.879 for SMS vs. 0.839 for NOSMS, P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: The SMS technique could further improve the image quality and the diagnostic performance of rs-EPI DWI in a comparable time.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]