These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Structure based design and synthesis of 3-(7-nitro-3-oxo-3,4-dihydroquinoxalin-2-yl)propanehydrazide derivatives as novel bacterial DNA-gyrase inhibitors: In-vitro, In-vivo, In-silico and SAR studies.
    Author: Saleh MA, Elmaaty AA, El Saeed HS, Saleh MM, Salah M, Ezz Eldin RR.
    Journal: Bioorg Chem; 2022 Dec; 129():106186. PubMed ID: 36215786.
    Abstract:
    Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the critical challenges that have been encountered over the past years. On the other hand, bacterial DNA gyrase is regarded as one of the most outstanding biological targets that quinolones can extensively inhibit, improving AMR. Hence, a novel series of 3-(7-nitro-3-oxo-3,4-dihydroquinoxalin-2-yl)propanehydrazide derivatives (3-6j) were designed and synthesized employing the quinoxaline-2-one scaffold and relying on the pharmacophoric features experienced by the quinolone antibiotic; ciprofloxacin. The antibacterial activity of the synthesized compounds was assessed via in-vitro approaches using eight different Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial species. Most of the synthesized compounds revealed eligible antibacterial activities. In particular, compounds 6d and 6e displayed promising antibacterial activity among the investigated compounds. For example, compounds 6d and 6e displayed MIC values of 9.40 and 9.00 µM, respectively, regarding S. aureus, and 4.70 and 4.50 µM, respectively, regarding S. pneumonia in comparison to ciprofloxacin (12.07 µM). The cytotoxicity of compounds 6d and 6e were performed on normal human WI-38 cell lines with IC50 values of 288.69 and 227.64 μM, respectively assuring their safety and selectivity. Besides, DNA gyrase inhibition assay of compounds 6d and 6e was carried out in comparison to ciprofloxacin, and interestingly, compounds 6d and 6e disclosed promising IC50 values of 0.242 and 0.177 μM, respectively, whereas ciprofloxacin displayed an IC50 value of 0.768 μM, assuring the proposed mechanism of action for the afforded compounds. Consequently, compounds 6d and 6e were further assessed via in-vivo approaches by evaluating blood counts, liver and kidney functions, and histopathological examination. Both compounds were found to be safer on the liver and kidney than the reference ciprofloxacin. Moreover, in-silico molecular docking studies were established and revealed reasonable binding affinities for all afforded compounds, particularly compound 6d which exhibited a binding score of -7.51 kcal/mol, surpassing the reference ciprofloxacin (-7.29 kcal/mol) with better anticipated stability at the DNA gyrase binding pocket. Moreover, ADME studies were conducted, disclosing an eligible bioavailability score of >0.55 for all afforded compounds, and reasonable GIT absorption without passing the blood brain barrier was attained for most investigated compounds, ensuring their efficacy and safety. Lastly, a structure activity relationship study for the synthesized compounds was established and unveiled that not only the main pharmacophores required for DNA gyrase inhibition are enough for exerting promising antimicrobial activities, but also derivatization with diverse aryl/hetero aryl aldehydes is essential for their enhanced antimicrobial potential.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]