These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: GPs' perceptions of teaching methods in shared decision-making training: a qualitative study.
    Author: Nyamapfene T, Butterworth J, Merchant H, Eaton M.
    Journal: Br J Gen Pract; 2023 Apr; 73(729):e310-e317. PubMed ID: 36253111.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Although shared decision making (SDM) is key to delivering patient-centred care, there are barriers to GPs implementing SDM in practice. SDM training is undergoing development by organisations, including the Royal College of General Practitioners. However, GPs' perceptions of the delivery of SDM training in general practice remain largely unexplored. AIM: To explore GPs' perceptions of teaching methods in SDM training. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative study of GPs with teaching roles at the University of Exeter Medical School. METHOD: Purposive sampling recruited 14 GPs. Semi-structured interviews explored their SDM educational experiences. Data were analysed using thematic framework analysis. RESULTS: Three themes were identified. The GPs described role-play, receiving feedback, and on-the-job learning as modes of delivering SDM training that mostly informed their SDM in clinical practice positively. Learning from knowledgeable individuals and using realistic patient cases were perceived as beneficial components of SDM learning, although most learning occurred implicitly through reflections on their clinical experiences. The GPs identified that their training on SDM should reflect the uncertainty that is present when sharing decisions with patients in real-life general practice consultations. GPs also identified the targeting of individual GPs' SDM learning needs and explanation of the potential benefits of SDM on consultation outcomes as important methods to facilitate the implementation of SDM in practice. CONCLUSION: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first UK study to explore GPs' perceptions of SDM training and provide recommendations for practice. As SDM occurs in partnership with patients, further research should obtain and incorporate patients' views alongside those of GPs in the evaluation of future programmes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]