These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Treatment patterns and outcomes of second-line rituximab and thrombopoietin receptor agonists in adult immune thrombocytopenia: A Canadian retrospective cohort study.
    Author: Podstawka J, Wall E, Bolster L, Patterson JM, Goodyear MD, Rydz N, Sun HL.
    Journal: Thromb Res; 2022 Dec; 220():5-11. PubMed ID: 36257098.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The optimal choice of second-line treatment for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is unclear. Guidelines recommend either rituximab, splenectomy, or thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA). There is, however, scarce data comparing treatment patterns, outcomes and resource utilization across second-line treatments. Despite Canada's universal healthcare system, publicly funded access to second-line ITP therapies is highly variable across provinces/territories. OBJECTIVES: To describe treatment patterns and compare health service utilization and outcomes among recipients of second-line rituximab and TPO-RA for ITP. METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, we included adults who received second-line ITP therapies rituximab, eltrombopag and romiplostim (2012-2020) in Alberta, Canada. Patients were identified through a provincially-funded special drug access (STEDT) program. We examined treatment patterns, predictors of second-line treatment, hospitalizations, blood product utilization, and outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate the cumulative incidence of ITP-related hospitalizations (bleeding or infections), overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the impact of second-line therapy on OS. RESULTS: 223 patients received rituximab (67 %), eltrombopag (29 %), and romiplostim (4 %). TPO-RA recipients experienced significantly longer time from ITP diagnosis to second-line therapy compared with rituximab recipients (15.9 vs 6.7 months, P < 0.0001), accompanied by significantly higher platelet and IVIG utilization prior to second-line therapy. Age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.04, 95 % CI 1.02-1.07, P < 0.0001) and prior intracranial hemorrhage (aOR 12.7, 95 % CI 1.6-272.8, P = 0.03) were significant predictors of second-line TPO-RA. TPO-RA is associated with a trend towards longer median RFS (6.3 vs 3.8 years, P = 0.06) compared with rituximab, and similar rates of ITP-related hospitalizations, major bleeding, and thromboembolism. Age, time period, and Charlson comorbidity index, but not second-line ITP therapy, were significant predictors of OS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified older age and intracranial hemorrhage as predictors of second-line TPO-RA prescription in a real-world practice. There were no significant differences in hospitalizations and outcomes between second-line rituximab and TPO-RA, although delayed initiation of TPO-RA was associated with higher blood product utilization.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]