These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Protection of Chinese hamster ovary cells from heat killing by treatment with cycloheximide or puromycin: involvement of HSPs?
    Author: Lee YJ, Dewey WC, Li GC.
    Journal: Radiat Res; 1987 Aug; 111(2):237-53. PubMed ID: 3628714.
    Abstract:
    Cycloheximide (CHM) or puromycin (PUR) added for 2 h before heating at 43 degrees C followed by either PUR or CHM during heat greatly protected cells from heat killing. This protection increased with inhibition of protein synthesis. Since treatment with a drug both before and during heating was required for heat protection, and since one drug could be exchanged for the other after the 2-h pretreatment without affecting the heat protection, a common mode of action involving inhibition of protein synthesis is suggested for the two drugs. Drug treatment reduced the synthesis of heat-shock proteins (HSPs) as studied by one-dimensional gel electrophoresis by 80-98% relative to 37 degrees C untreated controls. Synthesis of large molecules (greater than 30 kDa) was preferentially inhibited by PUR but not by CHM. Also for CHM, but not for PUR treatment, a 42 kDa band appeared along with a great reduction in the 43 kDa actin band during CHM treatment at both 37 and 43 degrees C. Furthermore, during CHM or PUR treatment, incorporation of [35S]methionine into HSP families 70, 87, or 110 was not increased relative to incorporation into total protein. However, synthesis of the 70 kDa HSP family was selectively suppressed when cells were incubated at 37 degrees C after CHM treatment, but when cells were incubated at 37 degrees C after treatment at 43 degrees C with CHM, synthesis of the 70 kDa HSP family resumed. When cells were labeled for 3 days, there was no preferential accumulation or turnover of HSP families during heating with or without CHM. Therefore, heat protection caused by treatment with CHM or PUR apparently involves a common mode of action not associated with changes in either total levels or synthesis of HSP families during drug treatment before and during heating. The significance of the changes observed in the synthesis of the HSP 70 family after heat is unknown. As thermotolerance developed during 5 h at 42 degrees C without drugs, synthesis of HSP families 70, 87, and 110, as studied with one-dimensional gels, increased 1.4-fold relative to synthesis of total protein, but compared to HSP families in cells labeled for 5 h at 37 degrees C incorporation was reduced by 40%. The increase of unique HSPs, if studied with two-dimensional gels, would probably be much greater.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]