These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Use of regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces and intramuscular electrodes to improve prosthetic grasp selection: a case study.
    Author: Lee C, Vaskov AK, Gonzalez MA, Vu PP, Davis AJ, Cederna PS, Chestek CA, Gates DH.
    Journal: J Neural Eng; 2022 Nov 14; 19(6):. PubMed ID: 36317254.
    Abstract:
    Objective.Advanced myoelectric hands enable users to select from multiple functional grasps. Current methods for controlling these hands are unintuitive and require frequent recalibration. This case study assessed the performance of tasks involving grasp selection, object interaction, and dynamic postural changes using intramuscular electrodes with regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNIs) and residual muscles.Approach.One female with unilateral transradial amputation participated in a series of experiments to compare the performance of grasp selection controllers with RPNIs and intramuscular control signals with controllers using surface electrodes. These experiments included a virtual grasp-matching task with and without a concurrent cognitive task and physical tasks with a prosthesis including standardized functional assessments and a functional assessment where the individual made a cup of coffee ('Coffee Task') that required grasp transitions.Main results.In the virtual environment, the participant was able to select between four functional grasps with higher accuracy using the RPNI controller (92.5%) compared to surface controllers (81.9%). With the concurrent cognitive task, performance of the virtual task was more consistent with RPNI controllers (reduced accuracy by 1.1%) compared to with surface controllers (4.8%). When RPNI signals were excluded from the controller with intramuscular electromyography (i.e. residual muscles only), grasp selection accuracy decreased by up to 24%. The participant completed the Coffee Task with 11.7% longer completion time with the surface controller than with the RPNI controller. She also completed the Coffee Task with 11 fewer transition errors out of a maximum of 25 total errors when using the RPNI controller compared to surface controller.Significance.The use of RPNI signals in concert with residual muscles and intramuscular electrodes can improve grasp selection accuracy in both virtual and physical environments. This approach yielded consistent performance without recalibration needs while reducing cognitive load associated with pattern recognition for myoelectric control (clinical trial registration number NCT03260400).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]