These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Computer-based analysis of different component positions and insert thicknesses on tibio-femoral and patello-femoral joint dynamics after cruciate-retaining total knee replacement.
    Author: Kebbach M, Geier A, Darowski M, Krueger S, Schilling C, Grupp TM, Bader R.
    Journal: Knee; 2023 Jan; 40():152-165. PubMed ID: 36436384.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Positioning of the implant components and tibial insert thickness constitute critical aspects of total knee replacement (TKR) that influence the postoperative knee joint dynamics. This study aimed to investigate the impact of implant component positioning (anterior-posterior and medio-lateral shift) and varying tibial insert thickness on the tibio-femoral (TF) and patello-femoral (PF) joint kinematics and contact forces after cruciate-retaining (CR)-TKR. METHOD: A validated musculoskeletal multibody simulation (MMBS) model with a fixed-bearing CR-TKR during a squat motion up to 90° knee flexion was deployed to calculate PF and TF joint dynamics for varied implant component positions and tibial insert thicknesses. Evaluation was performed consecutively by comparing the respective knee joint parameters (e.g. contact force, quadriceps muscle force, joint kinematics) to a reference implant position. RESULTS: The PF contact forces were mostly affected by the anterior-posterior as well as medio-lateral positioning of the femoral component (by 3 mm anterior up to 31 % and by 6 mm lateral up to 14 %). TF contact forces were considerably altered by tibial insert thickness (24 % in case of + 4 mm increase) and by the anterior-posterior position of the femoral component (by 3 mm posterior up to 16 %). Concerning PF kinematics, a medialised femoral component by 6 mm increased the lateral patellar tilt by more than 5°. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that regarding PF kinematics and contact forces the positioning of the femoral component was more critical than the tibial component. The positioning of the femoral component in anterior-posterior direction on and PF contact force was evident. Orthopaedic surgeons should strictly monitor the anterior-posterior as well as the medio-lateral position of the femoral component and the insert thickness.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]