These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Application of a Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling (VAMS)-Based Method for the Determination of Paracetamol and Four of its Metabolites as a Tool for Pharmacokinetic Studies in Obese and Non-Obese Patients.
    Author: Boffel L, Delahaye L, De Baerdemaeker L, Stove CP.
    Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet; 2022 Dec; 61(12):1719-1733. PubMed ID: 36451028.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of a drug is influenced by several factors, which can lead to a suboptimal dosing regimen in specific patient populations. As obesity becomes increasingly prevalent, it is important that optimized dosing schemes are available for these patients. To set up such dosing schemes, PK studies should be performed in this population. Regarding paracetamol (acetaminophen [APAP]), obese patients would benefit from a tailored dosing scheme, as both the volume of distribution and metabolism are increased compared with non-obese patients. This includes metabolism by cytochrome P450 2E1, which is involved in APAP-associated hepatotoxicity. To decrease the burden for patients in these PK studies, finger-prick sampling could be used. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the quantitative determination of APAP and four metabolites in different blood-based matrices and to determine if capillary dried blood samples, collected directly following finger-prick, could serve as a tool to investigate APAP PK in obese and non-obese patients. METHODS: In this study, we performed a clinical validation of methods for the determination of APAP and four of its metabolites (APAP-glucuronide, APAP-sulfate, APAP-mercapturate, and APAP-cysteine) in blood, plasma, and dried blood. The latter was obtained by volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), either starting from the venous blood or collected directly following a finger-prick. Results were compared between the different matrices and, in addition, blood:plasma (B:P) ratios were determined for the different analytes. RESULTS: Liquid and dried venous blood results were in good agreement. Furthermore, differences between capillary (finger-prick) and venous VAMS blood samples remained limited for most analytes. However, for APAP-cysteine, caution should be paid to the interpretation of concentrations in (dried) blood. With the exception of APAP, concentrations were higher in plasma compared with blood, with B:P ratios ranging between 0.52 and 0.65. A time-dependent change in median B:P ratio was observed for APAP and APAP-cysteine. Additionally, a time-dependent trend was seen for APAP, as well as for APAP-glucuronide and APAP-mercapturate, for the distribution between capillary and venous blood. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that finger-prick sampling is a viable alternative to conventional venous blood sampling to investigate the PK of APAP and its metabolites in obese and non-obese patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]