These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Influence of wind direction on the ventilation and pollutant dispersion in different 3D street canyon configurations: numerical simulation and wind-tunnel experiment.
    Author: Jon KS, Huang YD, Sin CH, Cui PY, Luo Y.
    Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(11):31647-31675. PubMed ID: 36454524.
    Abstract:
    Configuration of street canyon and the wind environment have a great influence on the self-ventilation capacity of the canyon, but the couple-effect of these two factors could not be considered in the previous study. The purpose of this study is to clarify the couple effect of street canyon configuration and wind environment on the ventilation and pollutant dispersion inside the street canyon. For this purpose, five wind directions of α = 90°, 60°, 45°, 30°, and 0° (α is the angle between the approaching wind and street canyon) and three canyon configurations (flat, step-up, and step-down canyons) were considered with numerical simulation and wind-tunnel experiment. Meanwhile, ACH (air exchange rate) and NEV (net escape velocity) were used to evaluate the ventilation capacity of the canyon. The results reveal that the wind direction has a vital influence on the ventilation in the different canyon configurations. Under the parallel wind direction (α = 0°), the airflow and ventilation capacity inside the three canyons are similar. Relative difference of ACH, named as RDA ((ACHasymmetric-ACHsymmetric)/ACHsymmetric [Formula: see text] 100%), is 1.82%. However, under the oblique (α = 30°, 45°, and 60°) and perpendicular wind direction (α = 90°), the airflow of the step-down canyon is very different from the step-up and flat canyons. In step-down canyons, reverse flow occurs under the oblique and perpendicular wind direction, and the strength of the reverse flow increases as α increases. Due to this reverse flow, the ventilation capacity of the step-down canyon is lower than that of the step-up and flat canyons. As for the ventilation capacity in the pedestrian respiration domain, the ventilation capacity of the leeward pedestrian domain (leeward NEV) is higher in the step-down canyon than in the step-up canyon and the flat canyon (when α = 90°, leeward NEV of step-down canyon is 2.47 times the flat canyon). Conversely, the ventilation capacity of the windward pedestrian domain is lower in step-down canyons than in step-up or flat canyon (when α = 90°, windward NEV of step-down canyon is 0.1 times that of step-up canyon). The aforementioned findings are helpful to understand the effects of canyon configurations together with wind directions on the airflow as well as pollutant concentration inside the canyon. Although further researches are still required to provide practical guidelines, this study present effective methodologies to quantify the influences of street configurations and wind directions on street canyon ventilation for urban design purpose.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]