These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Responses of Purkinje cells and mossy fibres in the flocculus of the monkey during sinusoidal movements of a visual pattern. Author: Noda H, Warabi T. Journal: J Physiol; 1987 Jun; 387():611-28. PubMed ID: 3656184. Abstract: 1. Discharges of Purkinje cells (P cells) and mossy fibres were recorded from the cerebellar flocculus of monkeys trained to fixate a stationary visual target. The units were tested with a sinusoidally moving random dot pattern (background) which was projected on an entire screen or on part of it. The receptive field organization of the units was tested by changing the area of stimulus presentation on the screen and by changing the direction of visual fixation. 2. When stimulated with sinusoidal movements of the background in the horizontal plane, ninety-two of 684 Purkinje cells (13.5%) responded to the retinal-slip velocity. Seventy-eight of the ninety-two visually responsive Purkinje cells (84.8%) also showed cyclic modulations in activity during horizontal smooth-pursuit eye movements (these were so-called horizontal gaze-velocity Purkinje cells). 3. In response to the sinusoidal retinal-slip velocity, the visual Purkinje cells showed six types of discharge patterns. Type 1 Purkinje cells (28/92 or 30.4%) were directionally selective: they showed a peak activity during background movement in one direction and a trough in the other. Both peaks and troughs were related to stimulus velocities. Their receptive fields were relatively large (greater than 45 deg) and included the fovea. 4. Type 2 (8/92 or 8.7%) and type 3 (5/92 or 5.4%) Purkinje cells showed sinusoidal responses similar to those of type 1 Purkinje cells, but the visual inputs were primarily excitatory in type 2 Purkinje cells and inhibitory in type 3 Purkinje cells. Only the peaks in type 2 and troughs in type 3 were related to stimulus velocities. 5. Type 4 (4/92 or 4.3%) and type 5 (11/92 or 12.0%) Purkinje cells showed responses to stimulus movements in both directions (bidirectional). When the moving background was projected with 10 deg of fixation, type 4 Purkinje cells were excited bidirectionally in relation to retinal-slip velocities. When the periphery of either hemiretina was stimulated, type 5 Purkinje cells were inhibited and the trough activity was stimulus-velocity dependent. Receptive fields were found in the ipsilateral hemiretinae in seven type 5 Purkinje cells and in the contralateral hemiretinae in the remaining four type 5 Purkinje cells. 6. Type 6 (36/92 or 39.1% Purkinje cells received an excitatory input from the central retina and an inhibitory input from the periphery. The peripheral receptive fields were either in the ipsilateral (69.4%) or contralateral (30.6%) hemiretinae of both eyes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]