These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes' motivations, and athlete satisfaction.
    Author: Jin H, Kim S, Love A, Jin Y, Zhao J.
    Journal: Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1012953. PubMed ID: 36578680.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: The current study investigated the impacts of autocratic and democratic leadership styles on the coach-athlete relationship, athletes' motivations, and athlete satisfaction. METHODS: Survey data were collected from 298 student-athletes (male = 157; 52.7%, female = 141; 47.3%) from 20 different Chinese collegiate sports. The Structural Equation Model was used to test the hypothesized model. RESULTS: The results indicated democratic leadership had a direct positive influence on the coach-athlete relationship, while autocratic leadership had no direct effect. Both leadership styles did not influence autonomous motivation. The coach-athlete relationship, meanwhile, had a full mediation effect between democratic leadership and athletes' motivation and satisfaction. In addition, autonomous motivation had a partial mediation effect between the coach-athlete relationship and athlete satisfaction. DISCUSSION: Ultimately, the findings of the current study underscore the need for coaches and administrators to understand the impact of different leadership styles and highlight the importance of democratic leadership in improving athletes' psychological outcomes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]