These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Contraception at risk].
    Author: Dubois C, Le Strat N.
    Journal: Rev Prat; 1987 Sep 21; 37(38):2293-301. PubMed ID: 3659796.
    Abstract:
    Certain physiological and pathological conditions in women require choice of a contraceptive method that will not aggravate the condition or exacerbate known side effects. IUDs and oral contraceptives (OCs) are not appropriate for the immediate postpartum. Low dose progestins appear best suited and can be started on the 5th day after delivery. IUDs and high dose discontinuous progestins are the best choices for the menopausal period, but contraindications to them must be respected. Contraception with a dominant progestational climate is required in case of benign breast disease. Low dose progestins may cause luteal insufficiency and low dose combined OCs may allow endogenous estradiol secretion poorly balanced by the progestin. All progestin-dominant formulations and discontinuous 19-norsteroids may be used. 19-norsteroids appear suitable for women with breast cancer because of their antiestrogenic activity. High dose progestins are advisable for women with precancerous or cancerous endometrial pathology. Estrogens should be avoided in such cases. Cervical cancer has never been proven to be hormonodependent, and at present the use of hormonal contraception in cervical dysplasia is not contraindicated except after pelvic radiation for invasive cancer. Use of the IUD has the same indications as for the general population after lesions have been treated. In cases of hyperlipidemia, low doses of continuously administered 19-norsteroids cause a decline of high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol but are considered to be without longterm metabolic effects. The new progestin desogestrel does not diminish HDL cholesterol. Many cases of hyperlipidemia and hypercholesterolemia contraindicate OCs at the usual dose and require mechanical contraception, although low dose progestins may be considered. Derivatives of 17-hydroxyprogesterone are without effects on lipid metabolism but are less reliable. No contraceptive method is fully satisfactory for diabetics. Hormonal contraception is risky because of possible metabolic and vascular effects. Low dose progestins have the fewest side effects but are often poorly tolerated. IUDs are often used for diabetics despite possible increased risks of infection and failure. Hypertensive women should not use combined OCs or high-dose 19-norsteroids, but low dose progestins carry no risk of hypertension. Women at vascular risk are advised to use IUDs if no specific contraindications are found. Otherwise low-dose progestins are an acceptable choice. Low dose progestins are often the only possibility for cardiac patients. Nonhypertensive women with renal insufficiency can use OCs under careful supervision if there are no contraindications. Combined OCs are contraindicated when there is any disturbance of hepatic function, but low dose progestins or mechanical means are acceptable. Chronic use of certain drugs which act as enzymatic inductors is incompatible with hormonal contraception.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]