These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Percutaneous cryoablation versus partial nephrectomy for cT1b renal tumors: An inverse probability weight analysis.
    Author: Aikawa K, Yanagisawa T, Fukuokaya W, Shimizu K, Miyajima K, Nakazono M, Iwatani K, Matsukawa A, Obayashi K, Kimura S, Tsuzuki S, Sasaki H, Abe H, Sadaoka S, Miki J, Kimura T.
    Journal: Urol Oncol; 2023 Mar; 41(3):150.e11-150.e19. PubMed ID: 36604229.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To investigate differential clinical outcomes in patients treated with partial nephrectomy (PN) vs. percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) for cT1b renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 119 patients who had undergone PN (n = 90) or PCA (n = 29) for cT1b renal tumors. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used for balancing patient demographics, including renal function and tumor complexity. Perioperative complications, renal function preservation rates, and oncological outcomes such as local recurrence-free, metastasis-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival were compared using IPW-adjusted restricted mean survival times (RMSTs). RESULTS: PCA was more likely to be selected for octogenarians (odds ratio: 11.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.33-45.1). During the median follow-up of 43 months in the PCA group and 36.5 months in the PN group, unablated local residue or local recurrence was noted in 6 patients in the PCA group and local recurrence was noted in 4 patients in the PN groups. Of the 6 patients in the PCA group, 4 underwent salvage PCA, and local control had been achieved at the last visit. In the IPW-adjusted population, PCA had significantly worse local recurrence-free survival compared with PN (IPW-adjusted RMST difference: -22.7 months, 95% CI: -45.3 to -0.4, P = 0.046). IPW-adjusted RMST for metastasis-free survival (P = 0.23), cancer-specific survival (P = 0.77), and overall survival (P = 0.11) did not differ between PCA and PN. In addition, PN was not a predictor for local control failure at the last visit (odds ratio: 0.30, 95%CI: 0.05-1.29). There were no statistically significant differences between PN and PCA in renal function preservation or overall/severe complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cT1b renal tumor, although the local recurrence rate is higher for PCA than for PN, PCA provides comparable distant oncologic outcomes. PCA can be an alternative treatment option for elderly, comorbid patients, even those with cT1b renal tumors.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]