These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Diffusion tensor imaging and quantitative T2 mapping to monitor muscle recovery following hamstring injury.
    Author: Monte JR, Hooijmans MT, Froeling M, Oudeman J, Tol JL, Strijkers GJ, Nederveen AJ, Maas M.
    Journal: NMR Biomed; 2023 Jul; 36(7):e4902. PubMed ID: 36630472.
    Abstract:
    MRI examinations are accurate for diagnosing sports-related acute hamstring injuries. However, sensitive imaging methods for assessing recovery of these injuries are lacking. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and quantitative T2 (qT2) mapping have both shown promise for assessing recovery of muscle micro trauma and exercise effects. The purpose of this study was to explore the potential of DTI and qT2 mapping for monitoring the muscle recovery processes after acute hamstring injury. In this prospective study, athletes with an acute hamstring injury underwent a 3-T MRI examination of the injured and contralateral hamstrings including DTI and qT2 measurements at three time points: (1) within 1 week after sustaining the injury, (2) 2 weeks after time point 1, and (3) return to play (RTP). A linear mixed model was used for time-effect analysis and paired t-tests for the detection of differences between injured and uninjured muscles. Forty-one athletes (age 27.8 ± 7 years; two females and 39 males) were included. Mean RTP time was 50 (range 12-169) days. A significant time effect was found for mean diffusivity, radial diffusivity, and the second and third eigenvalues (p ≤ 0.001) in the injured muscles. Fractional anisotropy (p = 0.40), first eigenvalue (p = 0.02), and qT2 (p = 0.61) showed no significant time effect. All DTI indices, except for fractional anisotropy, were significantly elevated compared with control muscles right after the injury (p < 0.001). Values normalized during the recovery period, with no significant differences between control and injured muscles at RTP (p values ranged from 0.08 to 0.51). Mean qT2 relaxation times in injured muscles were not significantly elevated compared with control muscles at any time point (p > 0.04). In conclusion, DTI can be used to monitor recovery after an acute hamstring injury. Future work should explore the potential of DTI indices to predict RTP and recovery times in athletes after an acute strain injury.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]