These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Biomechanical Performances of an Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Cage in Models with Different Bone Densities: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Author: Xue S, Wu T.
    Journal: Indian J Orthop; 2023 Jan; 57(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 36660489.
    Abstract:
    STUDY DESIGN: Finite element models of the L3-S1 vertebrae were reconstructed using computed tomography scans. OBJECTIVE: We compared the biomechanical performances of an oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) cage in different bone density mode. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Low bone density is an els.key factor limiting the use of stand-alone OLIF cage. METHODS: Four models-intact (M0), normal bone density with OLIF (M1), bone mass loss with OLIF (M2), and osteoporotic with OLIF (M3)-were created based on 3-dimensional scans. Flexion, extension, and lateral bending movements (each lasting 10 N·m) were performed on the superior surface of the L3 vertebra with a compressive preload of 500 N. Range of motion (ROM), peak stresses in the L4-5 cortical endplates, cage stress, and adjacent intervertebral disk stress were evaluated. RESULTS: ROMs during different physiological movements were similar to those reported by previous researchers. Compared with that in M0, L4-5 ROMs of all movements decreased in M1, M2 and M3, most evidently in M3. Stress distribution in the cortical endplates rose to 7.8% in M1 and M2, even 16.2% in M3. Cage stress increased by less than 8.1% in M1 and M2, but by 25.3% in M3, especially in the movements of extension and right rotation. Compared with that in M0, L3-4 and L5-S1 intervertebral disk stress increased with bone density in all the other models, by up to 69.8% and 98.3%, respectively. As osteoporosis worsened, stress in the adjacent intervertebral disk also increased. CONCLUSION: Stand-alone OLIF in M3 is not recommended because of the risk of cage subsidence. OLIF in M1 and M2 achieved similar results in various lumbar spine movements. In M1 and M2 model (T >  - 2.5), the L4-L5 showed reduced mobility in all directions, increased rigidity, limited cage displacement, lessened deformation, and better stability.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]