These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Introduction of the Ellavi uterine balloon tamponade into the Kenyan and Ghanaian maternal healthcare package for improved postpartum haemorrhage management: an implementation research study.
    Author: Parker ME, Qureshi Z, Deganus S, Soki J, Cofie P, Dapaah P, Owusu R, Gwako G, Osoti A, Ogutu O, Opira J, Sunkwa-Mills G, Boamah M, Srofenyoh E, Aboagye P, Fofie C, Kaliti S, Morozoff C, Secor A, Metzler M, Abu-Haydar E.
    Journal: BMJ Open; 2023 Feb 03; 13(2):e066907. PubMed ID: 36737079.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: Use of intrauterine balloon tamponades for refractory postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) management has triggered recent debate since effectiveness studies have yielded conflicting results. Implementation research is needed to identify factors influencing successful integration into maternal healthcare packages. The Ellavi uterine balloon tamponade (UBT) (Ellavi) is a new low-cost, preassembled device for treating refractory PPH. DESIGN: A mixed-methods, prospective, implementation research study examining the adoption, sustainability, fidelity, acceptability and feasibility of introducing a newly registered UBT. Cross-sectional surveys were administered post-training and post-use over 10 months. SETTING: Three Ghanaian (district, regional) and three Kenyan (levels 4-6) healthcare facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Obstetric staff (n=451) working within participating facilities. INTERVENTION: PPH management training courses were conducted with obstetric staff. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Facility measures of adoption, sustainability and fidelity and individual measures of acceptability and feasibility. RESULTS: All participating hospitals adopted the device during the study period and the majority (52%-62%) of the employed obstetric staff were trained on the Ellavi; sustainability and fidelity to training content were moderate. The Ellavi was suited for this context due to high delivery and PPH burden. Dynamic training curriculums led by local UBT champions and clear instructions on the packaging yielded positive attitudes and perceptions, and high user confidence, resulting in overall high acceptability. Post-training and post-use, ≥79% of the trainees reported that the Ellavi was easy to use. Potential barriers to use included the lack of adjustable drip stands and difficulties calculating bag height according to blood pressure. Overall, the Ellavi can be feasibly integrated into PPH care and was preferred over condom catheters. CONCLUSIONS: The training package and time saving Ellavi design facilitated its adoption, acceptability and feasibility. The Ellavi is appropriate and feasible for use among obstetric staff and can be successfully integrated into the Kenyan and Ghanaian maternal healthcare package. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT04502173; NCT05340777.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]