These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Patient-reported goal achievements after pelvic floor muscle training versus pessary in women with pelvic organ prolapse. A randomised controlled trial.
    Author: Limbutara W, Bunyavejchevin S, Ruanphoo P, Chiengthong K.
    Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Dec; 43(1):2181061. PubMed ID: 36803636.
    Abstract:
    The aim was to assess the achievement by self-determined goals in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) participants receiving pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) compared to vaginal pessary. Forty participants with POP stage II to III were randomly allocated to pessary or PFMT. Participants were asked to list up 3 goals they expected from treatment. Thai version of Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QOL) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised (PISQ-IR) were completed at 0 and 6-week period. At 6-week post-treatment, they were asked if their goals had been achieved. The totally achieved goals in the vaginal pessary group were 70% (14/20) significantly higher than PFMT group at 30% (6/20) (p = 0.01). The mean ± SD of the post-treatment P-QOL score in the vaginal pessary group was significantly lower than the PFMT group (13.90 ± 10.83 vs 22.04 ± 5.93, p = 0.01), but not different in all PISQ-IR subscales. Pessary treatment for POP yielded better total goal achievements and better quality of life than PFMT for POP treatment at a 6-week follow-up.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can severely affect the quality of life, causing physical, social, psychological, occupational, and/or sexual dysfunction. Individual patient goal setting and goal achievement scaling (GAS) offers a new method of patient-reported outcome measurement (PRO) in therapeutic success such as pessary or surgery in patient with POP. But there is no randomised controlled trial comparing pessary vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) using GAS as the outcome measurement.What do the results of this study add? The results showed that women with POP stage II to III who received vaginal pessary had higher totally goal achievements and better quality of life than the women received the PFMT at 6-week follow up.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The information about the better goal achievements by using pessary can be used as the tools for counselling for patients with POP for selecting the choices for the treatment in the clinical setting. POP stage II to III patients treatedwith vaginal pessary had higher totally goal achievements and better quality of life than treated by PFMT.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]