These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Marginal gap distance and cyclic fatigue loading for different all-ceramic endocrowns.
    Author: Elsayed SM, Emam ZN, Abu-Nawareg M, Zidan AZ, Elsisi HA, Abuelroos EM, Fansa HA, Shokier HMR, Elbanna KA.
    Journal: Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Feb; 27(3):879-887. PubMed ID: 36808333.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the fabrication techniques of two types of glass ceramics on the marginal gap distance and the fracture resistance of endocrown restorations after cyclic loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted mandibular first molars were root canal treated. Decoronation was done for all the endodontically treated teeth 2 mm above the cemento-enamel junction. The teeth were individually fixed vertically into epoxy resin mounting cylinders. All teeth were prepared to receive endocrown restorations. The prepared teeth were randomly divided into four equal groups (n=10) according to the all-ceramic materials and technique used for endocrown construction as follows: Group I (n=10): Pressable lithium disilicate glass ceramics (IPS e-max Press), Group II (n=10): Pressable zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate glass ceramics (Celtra Press), Group III (n=10): Machinable lithium disilicate glass ceramics (IPS e-max CAD), Group IV (n=10): Machinable zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate glass ceramics (Celtra Duo). The endocrowns were cemented using dual-cure resin cement. All endocrowns were subjected to fatigue loading. The cycles were repeated 120,000 times to clinically simulate one year chewing condition. Marginal gap distance of all endocrowns was measured directly using a digital microscope with x100 magnification. The load required to failure was recorded in Newton. Data were collected, tabulated, and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Fracture resistance testing of all-ceramic crowns revealed a statistically significant difference between all different ceramic materials used in this study (p-value <0.001). On the other hand, there was a statistically significant difference between all the four ceramic crowns for the marginal gap distance either before or after fatigue cyclic loading. CONCLUSIONS: After considering the limitation of the current study, the following conclusions were given: endocrowns are considered one of the promising minimally invasive restorations for root canal treated molars. CAD/CAM technology revealed better results than heat press technology regarding the fracture resistance of glass ceramics. Heat Press technology revealed better results than CAD/CAM technology regarding the marginal accuracy of glass ceramics.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]