These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Long-Term Esthetic Outcome of Different Treatment Modalities for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Cervicofacial Lymphadenitis.
    Author: Willemse SH, Lindeboom JA, Karssemakers LH, Oomens MA, Schreuder WH, de Lange J.
    Journal: J Pediatr Surg; 2023 Sep; 58(9):1770-1775. PubMed ID: 36809867.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) cervicofacial lymphadenitis is a rare infection which almost exclusively occurs in children, most commonly children 0-5 years old. It can leave scars in highly visible areas. The present study aimed to evaluate the long-term esthetic outcome of different treatment modalities for NTM cervicofacial lymphadenitis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 92 participants with a history of bacteriologically proven NTM cervicofacial lymphadenitis. All patients were diagnosed at least 10 years prior and were aged >12 years upon enrollment. Based on standardized photographs, the scars were assessed by subjects with the Patient Scar Assessment Scale, and by five independent observers with the revised and weighted Observer Scar Assessment Scale. RESULTS: The mean age at initial presentation was 3,9 years and the mean follow-up time was 15.24 years. Initial treatments included surgical treatment (n = 53), antibiotic treatment (n = 29) and watchful waiting (n = 10). Subsequent surgery was performed in two patients, due to a recurrence after initial surgical treatment, and in 10 patients initially treated with antibiotic treatment or watchful waiting. Esthetic outcomes were statistically significantly better with initial surgery, compared to initial non-surgical treatment, based on patient scores of scar thickness, and based on observer scores of scar thickness, surface appearance, general appearance and the revised and weighted sum score of all assessment items. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term esthetic outcome of surgical treatment was superior to non-surgical treatment. These findings could facilitate the process of shared decision making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]