These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Hepatic metastasis detection: comparison of three CT contrast enhancement methods.
    Author: Miller DL, Simmons JT, Chang R, Ward BA, Shawker TH, Doppman JL, Chang AE.
    Journal: Radiology; 1987 Dec; 165(3):785-90. PubMed ID: 3685361.
    Abstract:
    A prospective, blinded comparison of three methods of hepatic contrast enhancement in computed tomography (CT) was conducted in 15 patients with colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the liver. Arterial portography (AP-CT) was performed with injection of contrast material into the superior mesenteric artery during CT. Delayed scanning (DS-CT) was performed 4 hours after intravascular administration of contrast material (mean dose, 280 mL). CT with an ethiodized oil emulsion (EOE-CT) was performed 1 hour after slow intravenous infusion of the emulsion. All patients underwent laparotomy following imaging studies. A lesion-by-lesion analysis of 56 metastases showed no significant differences in sensitivity (AP-CT, 77%; DS-CT, 83%; EOE-CT, 82%), but the false-positive rate for AP-CT was significantly higher than that for DS-CT (P less than .001) or EOE-CT (P less than .01). False-positive rates for EOE-CT and DS-CT were not significantly different. The predictive value of a positive test was 63% for AP-CT, 90% for DS-CT, and 81% for EOE-CT. AP-CT does not appear to be clinically useful for detection of hepatic metastases because of the high false-positive rate. No difference could be demonstrated between DS-CT and EOE-CT. DS-CT is a valuable method for hepatic contrast enhancement.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]