These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Development of a high-performance liquid chromatographic glycated albumin assay using finger-prick blood samples.
    Author: Aihara M, Irie T, Yasukawa K, Minoura I, Miyauchi N, Nishi M, Katayama N, Yachiku K, Jinnouchi H, Kadowaki T, Yamauchi T, Yatomi Y, Kubota N, Sekimizu K.
    Journal: Clin Chim Acta; 2023 Mar 01; 542():117272. PubMed ID: 36858193.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Home blood glucose monitoring can be effective for the self-management of diabetic patients. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is a widely used marker that reflects the average blood glucose within 1-2 months but does not sensitively respond to behavioral changes. Self-monitoring of blood glucose, continuous glucose monitoring, and flush glucose monitoring are sensitive; however, the cost and invasiveness of these tests prevent their widespread use. We focused on glycated albumin (GA), which reflects the average blood glucose levels over 1-2 weeks, and established a GA measurement method for self-sampling, finger-prick blood, which may be submitted for testing through postal service to receive weekly results. METHODS: A high-performance liquid chromatography assay was established to measure GA levels in finger-prick blood samples from 103 diabetic patients and the results were compared with venous blood measurements using an enzymatic method. Furthermore, conditions for sending blood samples by mail were evaluated. Under these conditions, samples from 27 healthy and 32 patient volunteers sent through postal service were compared with samples stored in the laboratory. RESULTS: GA levels were measured in samples containing > 20 μg albumin, which resulted in a CV less than 0.3%. The correlation between the GA levels of finger-prick blood measured using HPLC and the GA levels of venous blood measured using the enzymatic method was R2 = 0.988 with the slope ∼ 1.0, suggesting that the two were nearly equivalent. GA levels were stable for four days at 30 °C and two days at 37 °C. Mail-delivered samples exhibited a high correlation with samples that were not sent (R2 > 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: We established a method to measure GA levels in self-sampled, finger-prick blood sent through postal service in Japan. The method is applicable for weekly feedback of GA levels, which is potentially useful for motivating behavioral changes. In addition to markers such as HbA1c and blood glucose, GA can be used as a marker for assessing dietary and physical activities. This study highlighted the importance of GA monitoring by developing a suitable measurement method for weekly monitoring of GA levels.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]