These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Words Used in Letters of Recommendation for Pediatric Residency Applicants: Demographic Differences and Impact on Interviews.
    Author: Boolchandani H, Osborn R, Tiyyagura G, Sheares B, Chen L, Phatak UP, Puthenpura V, Elder RW, Lee S, Amster L, Langhan ML.
    Journal: Acad Pediatr; 2023; 23(8):1614-1619. PubMed ID: 36889506.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To describe differences in agentic (achievement) and communal (relationship) terms in letters of recommendation (LORs) for pediatric residency candidates by applicant and letter writer demographics and to examine if LOR language is associated with interview status. METHODS: A random sample of applicant profiles and LORs submitted to one institution were analyzed from the 2020-21 Match. Letters of recommendation text was inputted into a customized natural language processing application which determined the frequency of agentic and communal words in each LOR. Neutral LORs were defined as having< 5% surplus of agentic or communal terms. RESULTS: We analyzed 2094 LORs from 573 applicants: 78% were women, 24% were under-represented in medicine (URiM), and 39% were invited to interview. Most letter writers were women (55%) and of senior academic rank (49%). Overall, 53% of LORs were agency biased, 25% communal biased, and 23% neutral. There was no difference in agency and communally biased LORs by an applicant's gender (men 53% agentic vs women 53% agentic, P = .424), race or ethnicity (non-URiM 53% agentic vs URiM 51% agentic, P = .631). Male letter writers used significantly more agentic terms (8.5%) compared to women (6.7% agentic) or writers of both genders (3.1% communal) (P = .008). Applicants invited to interview were more likely to have a neutral LOR; however, no significant association existed between language and interview status. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in language were found by applicant gender or race among pediatric residency candidates. Identifying potential biases within pediatric residency selection processes is important in creating an equitable approach to application review.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]